女魔头

剥离了华丽的外表，剥离了道德的掩饰，剥离，剥离…… 所有无关紧要的，而又掩盖事实的成分全部被剥离。

一切赤裸裸的在眼前：爱情，罪恶，残忍，伤痛 　　 她们本来就是被损毁的人物。

一个饱受虐待的妓女，她曾经和所有的少女一样天真，一样满怀幻想，一样有过美丽情怀。

一个备受歧视的女同性恋者，不仅被异性恋歧视，在同性恋圈子里也同样被排斥。

于是在出场的时候一个被打得头破血流，一个手上打着绷带绑着石膏。

她们在社会上是残缺的，是受损的，是被与人群区别开来的。

一点点的亲近，一点点的关心，一点点的爱。

就像卖火柴的小女孩，捧着火柴，幻想着天堂的救世主，她们靠这一点点微弱的，颤抖的火光，幻想着相依为命的的甜美时光。

　　 她们又是在损毁他人的人物。

当女魔头射杀一个愿意无偿帮助她的老人，射杀一个死前念叨着“我的妻子，我的妻子……”的丈夫，念叨着“我的孩子，我的孩子……”的父亲，很难再用同情来形容我的心情。

哪怕她就是射杀一个正常的做交易的嫖客，那也是罪恶。

可是我又无法说，这个女人该死。

她想重新步入社会的努力都被拒绝了（拒绝她的不就是那些父亲母亲好人么？

）。

而情人需要快乐。

当情人在法庭上指证女魔头的时候，我的心都酸透了。

大难临头各自飞，但相煎又何太急（怎么又能不急呢）。

　　 想想她们开着红色跑车出逃的路上，在疾速的风里的狂欢，仿佛是一种仪式，接受命运之手的到来。

　　 　　　　这部电影惨不忍睹。

过了这么久才写下寥寥数语。

是为记。

记我看过的最为残忍的电影。

Aileen Wuornos《monster》、Marv《sin city》，把这两个人放在一起，他们有太多的共同点，只是电影对这两个人物的刻画里，M要酷一些，而A则是让人同情，当然这个不是我想写的重点。

M是漫画人物，身处被定义的环境，sin city 这是个理想状态的城市，处处都是深不见底的黑暗，即使像M那么强悍的人，依然摆脱不了那种精神上的空虚，孤独没人理解，深深的绝望但是没办法摆脱，似乎真理就是这样，他认定了绝望。

歌迪出现了，美丽的生命，就像是一束光打在他的心上，这温暖能融化M冷酷的心，不论是什么样的理由，就算只是利用，M也愿意用此生换这一晚。

A真实的人，处在社会的底层，我相信她看到的罪恶不比M少，或许更残酷。

难得的是A心中对爱的期待是那样的美好，只是生活不是戏剧，上帝帮不了所有迷途的羔羊，一天天down、down、down……直坠地狱。

在她决定自杀的那天，希尔比请她喝了酒，还让她住宿，温暖啊，莫名其妙的就这么来了，就算A不是les，为那种未曾体会过的美好性向算撒。

爱啊，总是来得那么蹊跷。

M知道歌迪只是找一个能让自己安全的人，所以他们之间的关系很简单，双方都是索取者和施予者，爱做的很贴近心灵，M的心灵得到了无与伦比的慰藉。

这种拯救的意义M知道，当歌迪死了，M知道任何理由都不能阻止自己的复仇。

A的希尔比就是上帝给的惩罚，这个小女人懦弱、自私、贪婪，为什么明知道这是上天给下的套A你还往里面跳？

看你局促的笑，看你的尴尬，看你的别扭，这些都不是你本性不是么？

好吧，我能把很多的原谅你的理由，放在你的出生，你的家庭，你教育水平低，你没有生存技能上，但是我不能够原谅你的是你的好逸恶劳、自以为是和贪婪！

对爱的辨别低，我很无语，但是最后希尔比给你下了圈套的时候，你还这么天真，你真可爱！

你对爱的向往、你对幸福的期盼难道没有告诉你，活着的每一天都是有希望的么？

死了什么都没了……似乎不是只有他们，我们每个人对爱的态度，总是参杂着些偏执，在追寻爱情的时候，在一起的时候，在爱离开的时候。

寻求理解、寻求关心、寻求爱与被爱的真谛。

人性就像是狗，给爱的时候呜呜软软的叫，含着满满的信任和幸福；被抛弃的时候，无法相信，心会变冷，开始怀疑，然后在外流浪，依然带着对爱的忠诚。

M比A潇洒的原因，是因为歌迪死了。

A比M幸福的理由，是希尔比还活着。

艾琳童年遭父亲朋友侵犯被赶出家门，成为卡车司机性服务妓女。

邂逅希尔比，感受到温暖和关怀，成为恋人，一起住在汽车旅馆里。

艾琳想找合法的有尊严的职业，面试中被人羞辱伤害。

只得重操旧业。

一次艾琳遇到虐待狂嫖客，艾琳开枪打死了这个男人，掩埋了他的尸体并抢走了他的钱和汽车，为满足生活所需和未来的憧憬，她开始频繁杀人，并杀害一个警察后被通缉，最终入狱，被判死刑。

查理兹塞隆表演很传神，细腻，夺得多个奖项女主角，实至名归。

jc /41314/04/2019 draftDr. F C Monster: Understanding How Aileen Wuornos Became The First American Serial Killer Film element: characters and their psychology issuesMonster is a biographical crime film based on Aileen Wuornos’s life story; a film about how Aileen Wuornos became a serial killer. The film is written and directed by a famous woman filmmaker, Patty Jenkins. Monster provided Charlize Theron, who plays Aileen Wuornos, a win at the Academy Awards for Best Actress, as well as other worldwide awards. Another protagonist, Selby Wall, was played by Christina Ricci. The film was produced by Denver and Deliah Films in 2004. Even to this day the film still maintains a high-value for society’s criminal studies by supplying people an insight into the world of a killer and an understanding of a human being’s dark side.The director, Patty Jenkins, is sympathetic to Aileen and opens a window to let people know what kind of tragic life her past held. In this film, the protagonist, Aileen is extremely miserable in all aspects of life, spiritually, financially, and emotionally. The serial killer, Aileen, was an innocent person who became a killer because she was forced by the environment that surrounded her.The conflicts within the film are well set; the goal of the protagonist, fantasy vs. reality, and the conflicts between characters are a few prominent conflicts that stand out. The most important conflict, in Monster, is that Aileen never achieves her fantasy about being in love and living a wealthy lifestyle. As a child, Aileen had a conscious, she was simple, grateful, hopeful, good-looking, and one who dreamed of a fancy life. As a child, she dreamt of becoming Marilyn Monroe but because of the terrible childhood environment, she was forced to endure she instead became an uneducated prostitute who lacked life skills and practical intelligence. She was frequently suffered from both mental and physical abuse. She was isolated. As time went by, Aileen got older and began to hurt more. She became more aggressive, confrontational, and violent. Until a raining night in a bar, before Aileen attempts to commit suicides, she meets Selby. Aileen thinks she finally found love and believes Selby will never hurt her. She tries her best to satisfy the immature Selby's desire for life, but Aileen does not possess too many abilities so she takes back her old job, because of Selby's will. One day, she has to kill a whoremonger to survive. She pretends everything is alright in life to make Selby happy, but never stops to take a look inside herself to see the broken heart that dwells. Unfortunately, Aileen’s sacrifices cannot fill Selby's real needs: living in bliss and without responsibilities. Selby stays with Aileen for pleasure and as an escape from her family. Aileen has never been loved by Selby nor anyone else, but her selflessness for Selby is love in itself. The few shining points within this film are the friendship between Aileen and the aged man and Aileen’s sacrifice for the wrong person, Selby, who has a narcissistic personality disorder. Although Selby was one of the causes that led Aileen to fall into the abyss Aileen still protects Selby from the law until her dying day. Aileen’s love for Selby is her last defense for her ideality towards love and life, and the last defiance to fate and to society. Aileen is a criminal who lost control of life and morals, but she is also a practitioner of faith and love. She is an idealist who sustains her principles of love, even though almost everyone, including herself, continues to hurt her and push her away.Besides analyzing the theme and well-made story conflicts set in this film, the next part of the paper will concentrate on how the director uses mise en scene elements to take audiences deeper into the killer’s life. Patty Jenkins pays attention to every detail of the story. She controls the pace and the mood of the film to make the audience empathize with Aileen’s tragic life. The use of mise en scene reveals Patty Jenkins's directing style in Monster is exquisite, meticulous, and cautious. Using the opening scene as an instance: the operation of aspect ratio, the composition, the camera works, the symbolism, the changing of color saturation, the changing of film tone, and the use of lighting in the opening scene will be analyzed. The first feature of the directing style in Monster is the way she operates the opening scene and its aspect ratio. The second outstanding characteristic is the cautious way she arranges the composition and the symbolism. Patty's unique opening design of the film starts with a video screening in a frame (a small version of 1.85 aspect frame ratio in a regular film frame size). The ratio of video screening between the whole film screen is about 1:13. The design of this opening is very forward and creative. It also starts with Aileen's narrative monologue overlaid by her childhood video screening. It grasps the audience’s attention and makes them feel as if they are watching a home video, which is also Aileen's life reflected prior to suicide. While the video is screening in the frame, audiences get a sneak peek, from Aileen’s point of view, of the cruel world she is a part of. The entire opening clip implies the background story that Aileen was raised in an awful family and had unpleasant memories growing up. When the frame of the small video gets bigger and bigger until filling the entire screen, the audiences are awarded a view of emptiness and hopelessness Aileen faces. At the same time, the flashback is over, the film starts the linear narrative, and the countdown of fate commences. In this first full-screen shot, which is high contrast and a high key wise shot of Aileen cowering under a flyover, audiences notice the strange dark shadow that draws and separates Aileen from the road. Audiences will face Aileen's unpredictable life by following her actions.The opening video screening starts with a close up of Aileen’s head, her eyes full of passion and hope. It's a high key shot with a balance lighting contrast with high color purity. It has a warm tone that has the most hopeful and cheerful feeling in the film, compared with the rest of the film. The light of sunset shines through the window and lights Aileen's back in a 3/4 degree angle; her head faces a mirror in a room without extra lighting. The symbolism and the dominated colors also set the mood at the beginning of the film. The blue, red, and yellow earth colors symbolize her tragic love, violence in life, and her unachievable dreams of wealth, respectively. Aileen as a child wears a blue silk scarf, looking at the mirror, and is framed by the redwood, symbolizing that she dreams about being surrounded by love and the beauty of human nature. She likes pretty stuff, but she gets only abuse in the future, the redwood frame symbolizes her life being affected and limited by violence. The gold necklace symbolized her desire for wealth. Aileen as a child was innocent, pure, and had nothing to do with violence. In this flashback opening clip, child Aileen seems happy and everything in the scene seems lovely. While the camera zooms out slowly, and the video frame is getting bigger and bigger, in the next shoulder shot, while she puts on another gold necklace, a hand touches her heavily touches her shoulder, and turns her back around; her eyes gaze innocently at the audience. This moment symbolized her crashing fantasy. In the next flashback, Patty uses one modern drawing as a transition shot. The narrator, Aileen, says that she stopped sharing her dream with people. A male comes into the frame taking her book away, and ordering her to do something else. She becomes sad and closes her eyes to escape reality. Based on the extreme close up of the angry male’s eyes, the audience is informed that as a child, Aileen, lived with a terrible father.The frame of the flashback memory is bigger than before, the color purity is lowered, the light on the scene turns to overcast, and the emotions on Aileen’s face are no longer innocent nor cheerful. She is angry. In the next wide shot and the following medium shot, people keep their distance from Aileen, while looking at her in an unfriendly way. Narrator Aileen continues to keep her dreams in her heart and intends to prove her dream will one day come true. She believes she will be the next Marilyn Monroe.However, in reality, her tragic life comes to the next transition. The wide shot of her walking on the road and getting into a stranger’s car implies that she has become a prostitute and homeless. In the next night scene, she is inside of a customer's car, the low light key, and the high contrast shows her life situation has worsened and the frame reverts backs to the regular film format size. Her memory ends and the audience starts to venture into her new life, a female serial killer is coming to the world for she is kicked out and abandoned by the male whoremonger and her fantasy dream about the perfect life begins to die. She thinks about suicide. While she sits under a flyover, a raining scene with a wide shot starts her new chapter of life. With a close up of Aileen holding a gun in her right hand, and 5 dollar bill in her left hand, she tries to commit suicide.The common characteristic of Patty Jenkins’ directing style, similar to other female filmmakers, is that Patty uses a lot of dialogue to reveal emotional changes for each character, which she then develops into multiple conflicts related to Aileen‘s fantasy of life and the struggles experienced in the real world.Arthur Schopenhauer thinks “Every life history is a history of suffering.” Human beings fall from pain or grow from it. Most people break laws because they couldn’t find a way out of their struggles. When there is unsolvable trouble for a long time, one may be controlled by depression, anxiety, or anger. Depression because of incompetence; anxiety is due to the unsatisfied desire; a fury is an act of the timidity of performance. When a person is crushed by the mix of irrational emotions like depression, anxiety, and anger, and lack any emotional support for a long time, he/she has the potential to hurt himself and others. Aileen Wuornos is a typical example that demonstrates how a broken soul can walk the criminal path. According to this film, people know Aileen was not a psycho, but she always lacked positive social support and was never loved by anyone. She is always depressed and had been controlled by anxiety and anger her whole life. Even though she never acquires love, she is a true believer in it. Her selfless love for Selby and her explicit behavior in faith for love leads audiences to think deeply about whether people possess love and the faith of life. Through this film, audiences can assume that Aileen Wuornos could have a better life if she had received any effective favors. Patty Jenkins sees the root cause of how and why Aileen became a criminal. This masterpiece of hers is more than a criminal feature, it’s an anti-romance biography of how an ordinary dreamer can become a killer. This film is a textbook study of criminal minds, a reflection of society’s desire for status, and most importantly, a guide that helps people to be wise and caring.Work Cited? None. none target audiences.

　　Selby，像个被宠坏的孩子，她年轻、虚荣，对爱她只知道索取。

Aileen在爱上她的时候可能就已经清楚自己注定是那个需要付出的人，只是她或许没有想到自己付出的将是全部——包括生命。

Aileen对Selby说：你不了解我的生活，但我了解你的。

我在一个混乱的世界做了很多事情，这些都是你没有听说过的。

所以你可以继续认为这个世界人都是好的善的，这也很合逻辑。

知道吗？

因为我爱你的一切！

　　所谓真爱，或许就是可以爱对方的全部，肯为对方付出全部吧？

可惜，Selby承担不起这样的爱。

东窗事发后，Aileen一个人承担下所有的罪行，Selby却在法庭上面无表情的挥起她瘦弱的臂膀指认Aileen.　　一百个人心中有一百个哈姆雷特。

有的人在这部影片中看到社会的残酷，有的人看到女人的感性，有的人看到Aileen的饰演者Charlize Theron为了这部影片增肥扮丑。

而我看到的是，Selby不配得到真爱。

Love conquers all.Every cloud has a silver lining.Fates can move mountains,love would always run away...看之前真没想到会那么戳人˃̣̣̥᷄⌓˂̣̣̥᷅ 本来只是因为看到了相关新闻，然后对一个人是如何成为连环杀人犯的这件事产生好奇。

开始猜测主角可能是因为身为妓女所以去报复性杀人，可混乱的人生不是能用简单的理由就能解释清楚的。

为了求生而杀人，为了留住爱人而杀人。

稀里糊涂地杀了人，理所当然地继续杀人，意识到自己是个真正的杀人犯时纠结崩溃着杀人......最后，付出一切抢到的车却也只能被抛在一边。

只会给别人kj的Leen，只会大骂脏话的Leen，不管怎么努力都逃不出这个可笑的人生怪圈。

“为什么你不继续当妓女？

你不当妓女怎么养我？

”唯一给过她爱的Selby也这样对她说。

但最后的最后，Leen还是那么爱她，哪怕Selby在法庭上没有看她一眼。

“Coz I love you with all my heart, my soul, my mind. And I will never let you down.” 但我也能完全理解Leen为什么会这样。

在没有遇到Selby之前她的人生已经结束了，在之前她已经是一个死人了，Selby给了Leen活下去的动力和意义，让她活了过来。

这对她那不堪的人生是幸还是不幸？

虽然短暂，但她也算是终于体会到一次被爱以及爱别人的感受了。

但不管杀不杀人，她所想要的那种拥有自己房子和工作的理想生活，永远都不可能实现......人生原来不是努力就能有出路啊。

本片原型Aileen在狱中一直与本片导演进行沟通，并交给她许多自己的私人信件，那个在镜子前做着演员梦的小女孩，以另一种形式走上了银幕......

同《断背山》一样,剧中的主人公自私贪婪，实在让人喜欢不起来。

对边缘人素无偏见,只是片子一开始好莱坞式的烂煽情就让人反感。

妓女就妓女好了,拿什么星梦破灭说事,逻辑混乱。

小女生式的成名梦，一味渴望名利财富,如果仅局限于儿时的众多奇思怪想之一也罢。

若以长大成人后的眼光看,这类理想未免太过纯物质且没有道理了。

更加不懂的是,就在旁人对其痴人说梦一片不相信声中,她竟莫明其妙地成了高速公路上的Street hooker站街妹,两者间关系令人费解。

之前的剧情顺利解释了绝大多数性工作者的心态——缺乏精神追求且贫图快速便捷的物质享受。

相比之下,另一主角Selby的思维及行为也达到了令人发指的地步。

这两个活宝也的确是天生一对。

因为爱,妓女决定从良,她将自己想从良的愿望告诉了Selby,结果这混球竟然问了一句很绝的混帐话:"为什么？

我听你过说那样不错啊"伟大的妓女同志并没有怒,只是停顿片刻向她解释道:"有时是不错，但这不是重点。

现在有了你，我就拥有了整个世界！

" 片中Selby年纪不大但起码成年,没有知识也该有常识,这行怎么会好过呢?如果是这样,岂不是人人都争做性工作者咯?能发表如此言论的家伙不是存在严重智力问题就是内心麻木不仁到一定境界了!Selby人格的一致性贯穿全剧:离家出走投奔爱人,花完了身上所剩的钱,大大方方提出:"你会照顾我的,是吧?"在家靠父母出门靠爱人,整个一寄生人!不仅啃老,所谓的爱人不过也是包养责任人。

骨折恢复之后拜托请对你自己负责。

四肢健在,头脑也灵活,能吃能睡能跑能跳,就是不能自立。

当妓女同志在外奔波,求职屡受打击的时候,Selby同学真强呀!不管不顾,直接了当表达肚子饿须进食的迫切需求。

粗线条的妓女同志又一次该怒而不怒,内心充满愧疚地干回老本行,同时发现了杀人夺车的发财新大陆。

妓女同志的爱情观貌似是:"爱你就养你,包你满意。

"并且该同志一诺干金,对爱人承诺过的待遇一定兑现,绝不开空头支票,坚持奉行"无毒不丈夫"及"宁可我负天下人"等至理名言。

同时又不乏"有所为有所不为"的仁义之举,放过了一个呆呆的胖司机。

但事事难料、人世无常,"人非圣贤,孰能无过呢?"所以,妓女同志"迫不得以,万般无奈之下"杀死了全片中最好的一个人,变身为名副其实的女魔头。

Selby同学在得知妓女杀人后还是相当的恐慌,毕竟法律的刑罚不是儿戏。

不过,害怕之后仍是一如既往我行我素,没车开要吵,去渡假的愿望未能满足要闹,拿别人用命换来的钱和新朋友鬼混,可人家也不太待见她,最后还是只有妓女一直守侯着她。

最让人拍手叫绝的是,该同学即使跑路时也不肯降低生活质量,坚决不搭大巴一定要自驾游,还以行李多为由劝说妓女。

妓女同志对爱人千依百顺,顾不上连续做案身体和心理的双疲惫,毅然滑向罪恶深渊,只为博红颜一笑。

当然,后来面对警方时,Selby同学再次本色出演,毫不犹豫与罪孽深重的妓女划清界限。

片子最终以一句废话结尾"Aileen and Selby never spoken again."即使是根据真实案件,确有其人其事,这样两个生物还是让人很无语,耗费人力物力将其搬上荧幕只是为了展示丑恶自私的灵魂,用来让人厌恶?未免太破费了。

She's undeniably guilty ，but this is definitely a tragedy 。

是因为 看了本片原型的 采访 及记录片 才去看的这部片子。

整體來說本片 80%的内容 都是基本还原了Aileen Wuornos 的真实经历 。

在Aileen Wuornos 被执行死刑的 前一天， 她告诉前来探望她的最好的 朋友 将自己 所有的私人信件 都交给 本片的导演 Patty Jenkins “ Hookers end up deadly on the side of the highway all the time ，and weirdly she went on to do these awful things becoz she was so hopeful that she could turn it around somehow ,by taking control of the situation u know , and in a strange way that hope kinda showed in the end ,she didn't know who i was ,she just hoped ,maybe i would do the right thing ... ” Patty Jenkins 必须说句很实在的 ，Charlize Theron 在本片的演技 確實入木三分 ，不论是造型，还是从说话的方式， 神情， 甚至体态 ，以至于某几个桥段 我甚至以为她已经变成Aileen Wuornos ， 她并没有刻意去把女主角 那种对社会的 愤恨和不满去 过分夸张 ， 因为参照原型 Aileen 本人非常的 有一种狂躁症的表现 ，言谈间很像在说电影台词一样的情绪化 ，并且很喜欢长时间的毫无间隙的说话 好像在填补环境中的沉默与空白 ，而她的愤怒也仿佛是一种伪装脆弱的手段 。

旁人会觉得她很疯癫 ，但实际上 在这背后隐藏的她复杂 病态的人生经历， 是造成她对社会 难以想象的 愤怒 和反抗的原因 。

所以相反的 Theron 并没有把她一味的塑造成 一个外人眼中的antisocial的疯子， 而是把一些细腻的 ，人物在社会底层挣扎的 生活状态诠释的很到位 。

几次不同状况下 杀人的 层次演变 从第一次 的 self defense ，被变态嫖客 殴打和 猥亵之后的自我防卫 (相信这一幕有许多人 都 在她成功 反抗之后 感到大快人心) 。

到 后来她 觉得自己可以此为经济来源的 习以为常，她都并不认为自己做错了 什么 。

因为如果 第一次的 杀人是情急所迫 ，那么之后 的 一系列 杀人 她也觉得与 之前并无本质区别 ，她早就受够了 这些男人 将她当成泄欲工具的 心态 ， 以及 最后 将 好心老男人杀掉的一瞬间，她才意识到自己是一个 杀人犯， 她的 良知的撤底崩溃都是十分 深刻及精彩的 表演 ） Aileen 的生活并非是她的选择， 就像她的童年也并非是他的选择 。

而她的一生一直就很孤独 悲惨 ，从没有人珍惜过她 ，支持她精神的最后一根稻草就是 那个 有些许自私的 Selby ，也许你会说她意志不够坚强 没有 在逆境中成长 ，反而轻易的堕入风尘 ，但某种程度上来说 你我都没有资格 去 评判 ，因为我们 永远无法切身体会 在这种人生际遇下 如何活下去的状态 ， 假若这一切发生在你我身上有多少人能够 承受这些精神和肉体的折磨 ，坚强的去过上正常人的生活 呢 ？

也许有人能， 但 有人 也许会开始怀疑自己存在的价值 ，尤其当你意识到所有一切 爱你的人都 已经离开（ Aileen 父母以及哥哥都在她20出头就纷纷去世） 而你孤单的 在这个现实的世界假惺惺的 活着 到底有何意义，她 到最后一刻 都在保护 selby （ 原型 在现实中 也是一样 花了 3小时 在 监狱 做 confession 承认一切罪名， 并坚称 其他人不知情来保护她的女友 ） 就像电影中说的 “ All she need is love ” 。

当一切都已无法回头 ，她选择 举起手枪 ，将子弹射向的并不是 某一个人 ，而是 这个世界 。

看《女魔头》之前，追捧女主角塞隆的文字已经像春风一样吹遍了各大媒体。

在这种舆论氛围下看这部电影，容易存在着某些逆反心理。

如果美女变丑只是一种喙头，那砖头就有得一拍了。

看到电影的最后一个镜头，艾琳有些倔强地被警方押走，她回头，一脸复杂的表情，给她这次的表演划上了完满的句号，我才发现群众的眼睛确实亮丽。

　　从电影制作的角度讲，评判一位演员有没有演技，并不仅仅限于她一个人的表现，银幕上表现出来的只是结果，而展现“演技”的过程则有导演、摄影、剪辑、灯光、化妆等部门来参与，缺一不可。

好演员需要懂得自己在整个影片制作中的地位和作用，知道在他们的参与下如何塑造出最到位的影像。

比如马兰·白龙度的“教父”角色，有那么出色的导演和摄影班底，他只要在皮椅上玩玩深沉，不用演就够味儿了。

　　说到塞隆演技过硬，也在于《女魔头》中制作部门并没有在她表演上给予太多的提升和帮助。

导演兼编剧派蒂·杰金斯，能写得一个层层递进有开端有发展有高潮，一切都规规矩矩的好本子，这个剧本可以说就是为突出女主人公而量身定作。

但他导演功力并不突出，整部片子从表现手法上看很普通——除了最后十分钟。

各部门也基本是照着好莱坞制作的惯例在进行着，如果不是《女魔头》题材比较吸引人（同性恋、暴力、性）、主演表现十分抢眼、再加上媒体的炒作，这种片子也许就少人问津了。

　　影片成功之处还在于，所有人都知道这部电影只有一个重点，就是突出那个“连狂女杀手”。

能接到这种角色应该也算是演员的幸运。

而塞隆明显是最大胆的一位，金发碧眼的她增肥30磅，变成“黄牙齿，满脸雀斑，身材壮硕的粗俗街头女子”，化妆师的本事可见一端。

而导演表现对话的手法就用好莱坞典型的三镜头，他还不厌其烦地逮着所有可能的机会给塞隆近景、特写、大特写，镜头没有过多的修饰，完全让那张惨不忍睹的脸尽情地表达一个被生活逼到绝路的杀手心态：从孤苦到压抑，从压抑到兴奋、从兴奋到无奈、从无奈到悲痛、从悲痛到狂野、从狂野到无畏，再从无畏到破碎……老实说，在一个角色里包含这么多个形容词，我是写起来累，塞隆同志演起来估计连半条老命都要搭上了。

不过她还是幸运的，有强烈表现欲的演员最喜欢这种导演了，这么大的发挥空间倒哪找去？

　　塞隆演得最成功的部分，集中在影片的后面二十分钟。

她违背自己尚存的良知杀死一个好心人，那种与命运硬顶着干的痛苦让人不忍再看。

而她面对被自己心爱的人在法庭上指证，更是影片最煽的一个段落。

电影看完后，估计大多数人在情感上都有点偏向于这个在现实中的杀人犯。

这就让当年的部分被害者家属感到不满，认为电影剧情过度美化了女魔头其人其事，故意淡化她凶狠残暴的一面，渲染她的苦命来赚取观众的同情和钞票。

看了开头，就知道不是什么好结局。

前半部分展示的基本上还是一个从小受到不公正待遇的女性自我选择的结果，是的，她的生活在最初是以悲剧开始的，但她往后的每一个选择都在把自己往更悲惨的深渊里推。

这个没人能帮得了。

影片第一次触动我，是在她决心找一份安稳工作，四却处碰壁尤不自知原因的时候。

口口声声重新开始，却因为快钱赚的太多，而不懂得如何踏踏实实的赚钱顾生活。

老实讲，我觉得面试他的考官修养和品德算得上极好，说的话也一针见血，“你不能轻易就实现别人奋斗终生的目标。

”仔细看电影细节可以体会，你的过往会造就你现在的环境，现在的环境又会影响你和你身边的人。

我们究竟是顺应环境被命运所左右，还是想方设法突破环境的限制改变命运，结果并不会因为一次心血来潮的偶然选择产生偏差，而是取决于漫长人生路上每一次微不可查的取舍。