王冠第四季

看过皇冠前几季的朋友都知道，玛格丽特公主年轻时爱上一个大自己十几岁的离婚男人，后来在教会的强烈反对下，不得不放弃这段感情，而公主以后的婚姻也不幸福。

因为当时的教规，严格来说，不赞同离婚的人再婚，如果前配偶依然活着。

生在皇室的玛格丽特公主，没办法避开严格的教规。

不得不含泪割爱。

当年在英国，还有一个大玛格丽特公主五岁的女孩，也叫玛格丽特，父亲是偏远小镇杂货店老板，我们就称她为玛格丽特杂货店妞。

玛格丽特杂货店妞24岁这年也遇上了一个大她11岁的离婚男人，是个有家族石油公司的小富二代。

杂货店妞家庭也宗教氛围浓厚，要再进一步发展关系，其实也面对教规的压力。

但是，杂货店妞毕竟在民间，不必像公主那样面对那么严格的条条框框，教规破了就破了呗。

玛格丽特杂货店妞26岁那年嫁人，正式成为玛格丽特撒切尔夫人。

婚后，杂货店妞在老公丹尼斯金钱和感情的双重支持下，步入政坛。

28年后，杂货店妞成为英国第一任女首相。

玛格丽特杂货店妞的婚姻持续了53年，白头到老，恩爱无比。

而喊着金汤匙出生的玛格丽特公主，后来却离婚了，猛抽烟，郁郁而终。

撒切尔夫妇很有意思，真实的童话没发生在王室。

那个真实的女生童话，从来不是玛格丽特公主，不是戴安娜王妃，而是小镇杂货铺出生的玛格丽特 撒切尔夫人。

出生卑微，自我奋斗，婚姻幸福，事业辉煌，优雅绽放。

《王冠》第四季，有着鲜明的“变”与“不变”。

变的是不同于前三季“欲戴其冠 必承其重”的一贯主题，而是将所有笔墨聚焦王冠为保护王权的中心对周边造成的巨大伤害，玛格丽特、查尔斯、戴安娜、表兄妹家族，甚至还有新闻发布官迈克。

在王冠耀眼的光环之下，那些被王冠阴影终生笼罩的人和事、那些细节、那些角落被一一呈现。

这一季，一改以往的中立、克制与冷静，主观镜头俯拾皆是，酷冷且凉薄。

不变的是它仍然不屑于那些耳熟能详的大事件大故事，而始终关注着作为个体、作为独立的人在这些事件和变故中的反应、表现和不被看见的复杂的内心。

花重金还原的世纪婚纱只出现了侧面的几秒钟的剪影，结尾也不如预想的那样展现童话的破裂，只定格在戴安娜孤独的背影，但却用细腻的笔触为我们勾画出我们看不见的那个女王、那个撒切尔、那个查尔斯、那个戴安娜。

客观与主观，本就不是对立的，在以现世的王室为主题的电视剧中，其实所有的表达和诠释都是主观的、再创造的，因为完全的真相和事实只有当事人知道，而在一部美剧中看到完全的真相和事实既毫无必要也混淆了纪录片与影视作品的不同。

以基本史实为依据，用艺术的手法不求逐一还原只求艺术展示地表现这些站在聚光灯下的特殊的人，并赋予他们普通人的喜怒哀乐，《王冠》已然取得了一部电视剧可以取得的非凡的成功。

一切作品，都是艺术家对现世的自我理解。

我们看到了这样的理解，并沉醉其中、深深理解。

本来就是想分享一下追剧感想和笔记，没想到收到很多交流意见和补充，感谢大家点赞评论私信🙏PS:单集分析请往下划哦剧评：第四季整体上的节奏来讲和第三季没有太大的区别(原班人马),在时间线顺序下兼顾重要国家历史事件与个体故事,同时每集相对聚焦于一特定主题。

不过第四季最大的不同是主角视角的丰富化(不论是戏份还是故事线中的重要性)——更多地倾向于戴安娜,以及被誉为“The iron lady ”的撒切尔夫人。

无疑,本季三个重头的主角是:女王、撒切尔夫人、戴妃。

在70年代末到90年代初,这三位主角也是当时英国最为耀眼、影响力最为广泛的女性人物,充分表现了政府与王室、婆媳、个人命运与社会进程之间的关系,当然也是女人与女人之间的关系(这才是真的一台大戏hhh)。

纵观全剧,第四季展现了1977年到1990年的英国历史事件,也是在英国在70年代“滞涨”危机后(英国在主要的发达资本主义国家中,始终保持最低经济增长率,最高的通货膨胀率,和最高的贸易赤字纪录),“撒切尔主义”对英国政治经济产生重大影响的阶段,也是英国王室的“光环”逐渐转向女王的后一辈来展现的时代。

到剧情本身，个人非常喜欢部分集数的剧本设计，比如下方详细分析的第二集；讲述“童话”中爱情的第三集、紧接着“最爱”引发亲情问题的第四集；最佳讲述历史大事给“48:1”，从时空交错、个人与群体的博弈，没有过多官方性的故事叙述，非常巧妙从个人视角、感情讲清楚英联邦事务、国际关系；同样“世袭爵位”以公主个人视角，用空间交错、场景强烈对比，最后相互联系，徐徐展开王室内部的冰冷规则；以及最后一集寓意深厚的“战争”，这是婚姻的战争，也是一个人与一个家庭的战争等。

历史线上因为十集各有侧重所以很多人物间的故事都是间接得知，这是因为剧集长度要“精”的结果，当然这会有很多遗憾：很多非常有料而精彩的大事没有展现。

比如撒切尔遭到爱尔兰军恐怖袭击的爆炸事件、戴安娜为了得到关心而怀孕摔楼梯等等，都是可以刻画人物和作为剧情高潮的事件。

演技上而言，包括女王在内的其他主演的演技依旧在线没得说（有点遗憾女王戏份变少，戏份难度也没有第三季高），撒切尔夫人神态实在是演的像！

令人惊叹得像！

大家可以去看看撒切尔夫人的纪录片，已经极近神似，尤其是撒切尔出身市井的那种独特口音和语调，不过有人说英音美音不是很get。

个人和某瓣历史爱好朋友交流后感觉，撒切尔唯一的美中不足就是80s初的表演略感苍，后期就比较合适了（上台初期真的是“刚”的精神矍铄）。

戴妃也很有气韵，评价为年轻的戴安娜再现一点不为过。

某瓣上有说撒切尔、查尔斯长得不像或者戴安娜选角如何如何的，想说这样的历史人物形象已经深入人心了，想要找到长相近且神似的人本身就及其困难，演员在动作表情的表演上极力接近已经充分表现专业性了。

纪录片《The iron lady》后续更新

按照音乐出场顺序建了歌单，欢迎来玩反响超大的第三集“童话”更了 第三集——童话？

爬楼不便，写豆瓣日记放链接了，欢迎继续在本帖留言交流呀。

个人非常喜欢第二集的剧本构思，问题导向、象征、引用、细致的人物刻画。

第二集主要内容：女王一家在巴尔莫勒尔堡度假，前后分别邀请撒切尔夫妇和戴安娜做客。

首相提前回到唐宁街对内阁开始大幅整顿，并且不惜风险计划推行新的财政政策，而戴安娜帮助王室捕猎公鹿成功，逐渐获得王室的青睐。

相比较第一集平铺直叙（有点失王冠水准），为什么说第二集构思巧妙呢，个人这样概括第二集的设计：一个测试，两个结果；一对矛盾，多个理念的冲突；一个意象，注定的结局。

首先，一个测试：巴尔默勒尔测试 the balmoral test，这也是本集的名称巴尔莫勒尔堡（Balmoral Castle）位于阿伯丁郡（Aberdeenshire）的巴尔莫勒尔庄园，一直是女王的私有住宅，王室常在此狩猎。

公元1852年，维多利亚女王以30,000几尼的价格买下了这座城堡。

（所以城堡内有很多维多利亚女王生前使用的物品）

所以王室要测试谁呢？

当然是政治上的新共事者——撒切尔夫人；以及可能符合王妃要求的种子选手——戴安娜小姐。

那么看看这两个人表现如何？

撒切尔夫人可以说绝对不及格，和王室种种都格格不入。

撒切尔夫妇来到城堡，他两被侍女带到休息的卧室，结果给了这对夫妻两个卧室，首相女士：“我还要和丈夫分房睡？？

”嘿嘿嘿（看到这主要表示感动，像纸牌屋里的总统夫妇还是分房睡的，室友夫妻◔◡◔）。

撒切尔先生面对一板一眼的侍女，忽然想到抽出几张英镑要给小费，侍女冷漠脸：客人都是走的时候放钱的。

（也许内心os:你当我是街边餐厅里的打工仔a）不过这还是前奏，紧接着：二人精细着装，首相还换上礼服（对撒切尔而言很是难得），却手忙脚乱地搞错了晚餐时间，下午茶时间来到城堡客厅准备吃晚饭，推开门……

王室：这两人脑子瓦特了？

；柯基：？？

我好萌？？

首相夫妇（端庄优雅）：什么情况？？

晚上玩一个类似于击鼓传花的数字游戏时，慢了2.5拍有余的撒切尔夫人：

掰手手数数的铁娘子快来看看第二天，集体去打猎，王室一家野外套装上身走起，此时撒切尔……

蓝色西装配高跟鞋，工作装我的最爱（王室：啊，这%*#）最后实在装备掉线，回来换装束，结果忍不住开始工作，but又坐错了地方

还记得维多利亚女王的遗物吗，谁都不可以动哦。

啊首相你破戒了包括之后两日的观看比赛等活动撒切尔也很难融入其中，最后因为内阁事务主动选择提前离开。

首相夫妇刚走，我们就迎来了二号选手小Di同学王室本来希望戴安娜能利用好这次“考试”尽力表现，结果她一不小心拿了满分。

在晚宴上幽默风趣又不失分寸，引得大家欢笑与菲利普亲王交谈，毫不避讳自己做清洁的工作还表现了自己对工作的热情，还让菲利普想起自己年轻时的军旅生活，二人交谈丝毫没有年龄上代沟。

最终能够一举成功，是依靠敏锐的观察力帮助王室成功狩猎公鹿的辉煌战绩（关于这头鹿后文会详细分析）

戴安娜成功判断对了风向，从而使亲王射击成功结果就是王室尽开颜，全家给予高度评价，满绩（当然不要忘记，这些优秀的表现的前提是：戴妃当时是一个天真年轻，无恋爱历史，还有贵族关系的女孩，这符合王妃要求）。

这也充分从这些细节描绘了戴安娜的天真活泼，亲切讨人喜爱的独特人格魅力，当然也有惊天美颜。

王室们满意得不行

查尔斯也赞叹连连虽然两位女性获得了不同的测试结果，不过这只是王室视角的选择，而两位主角在面对未来时也做出了自己的选择。

一对矛盾：浪漫的理想与尖锐现实的矛盾，与矛盾下多个理念的冲突。

查尔斯和戴安娜交流歌剧观后感其实说到事物的冲突矛盾，这一集中有很多，但我把它概括为浪漫的理想与尖锐现实的矛盾，是因为受到了“剧中剧”的启发：剧中查尔斯邀请戴安娜观看威尔第的歌剧（豆友提醒是威尔第的《安魂曲》）。

两人看完该剧之后有大概如下的交流：戴安娜很是喜欢威尔第剧中情节、人物表现的浪漫色彩，而查尔斯向戴安娜说若是只看到这些浪漫，而忽视了他的音乐对意大利革命的作用就不好了（现实色彩的部分） 威尔第，是19世纪意大利歌剧复兴时期最具代表性的歌剧作曲家，浪漫主义时期代表作曲家。

其歌剧以题材的社会性，现实性，人物和环境的质朴真实，音乐，戏剧的紧密结合，声乐歌唱的主导地位和变化丰富的动人旋律而著称。

他把意大利歌剧推向了一个新的历史高峰，为世界歌剧艺术作出了杰出的贡献。

同时威尔第的爱国歌曲，对意大利人民争取民主、自由与独立的斗争，起了巨大的推动作用，因此，威尔第获得了“意大利革命的音乐大师”的称号。

今天演出最多的四大名作是《弄臣》、《游吟诗人》、《茶花女》和《阿伊达》。

这个矛盾具体在不同主角的具体表现也不尽相同，在国家经济政治出现危机、王室的复杂锁链中，撒切尔、戴安娜和其他人也有着自己的理念与选择。

撒切尔夫人和王室为代表的贵族生活理念的不同而撒切尔夫人“举于版筑之间“，从学校到政府，是出了名的工作狂，时间管理大师——不放过每一个可以工作的间隙。

就连她的衣橱也是基本都是工作装，和丈夫之间也没有那些刻板的规矩，作为首相晚上还自己给家人熨烫衣服。

而对于国家事务，时间就是黄金，分毫必争。

看着王室娱乐时，抑制不住内心回去工作的冲动

（仔细看图）一个上午的政府工作会面进程撒切尔夫人和传统保守派政策理念的不同撒切尔是保守党党首，但是准确来说“保守”二字是对她经济政策性质的形容更加合适，而她本人充满改革的决绝和破旧立新的精神，激进而锐利，不惧阻挡。

所以面对依旧多为贵族出生的内阁保守派时，她觉得这些乡绅、贵族安于现状、无所作为，“上帝不该让胆小鬼做他的大使”。

于是她甚至不顾惜同党派内阁成员的身份，整顿内阁，排除年长、有特权/贵族背景、无毅力的旧人，引进政治新生面孔。

整顿后，白发老人少了许多，撒切尔夫人嘴角扬起也更高女王先问候式地提问：城堡之行第一次没让别人感到宾至如归？

（可见撒切尔与之前首相的差别）很快撒切尔就切入正题，表示自己开始重整内阁，排除的人主要因其贵族背景，并且要削减公共福利开支等新政策，当然这会导致失业甚至社会动荡等问题。

女王的回应是：

女王较少对政策发出评价而撒切尔夫人的回答是：“Not if one is comfortable with having enemies.”(对不怕树敌的人而言这不算什么)。

女王紧接着：“Are you？

”，撒切尔沉稳地：“Oh yes”（当然不怕）接着撒切尔引用了宪章派诗人 查尔斯-麦凯 的诗表达自己的想法。

这的确可以作为她自己的人生写照！

YOU have no enemies, you say? 你说你没有敌人？

Alas! my friend, the boast is poor; 呜呼！

我的朋友，这样的夸口实在可怜; He who has mingled in the fray of duty, that the brave endure, Must have made foes! 那些混杂于冲突中敢于承受责任的勇者，一定会树立敌人！

If you have none,Small is the work that you have done. 如果你没有，你所做的还实在太少， You’ve hit no traitor on the hip, 你没有狠狠打击过叛徒， You’ve dashed no cup from perjured lip, 你没有明晰过虚伪者的谎言 You’ve never turned the wrong to right, 你从来没有把错误变成正确， You’ve been a coward in the fight 在战斗中，你不过一直是个懦夫此时的撒切尔夫人，和城堡时拘束、不适应的状态天壤之别，政治舞台才是她的真正主场。

她的选择是放弃丝毫的自我浪漫，坚定地面对现实的尖锐，哪怕是敌对。

自信的微笑

此时的女王，略微牵强地带动嘴唇，还以微笑宪章派诗歌百科——是欧洲早期的无产阶级文学，也是一种新型的现实主义文学。

19世纪40至50年代，在英国产生了宪章运动。

宪章运动者为了进行鼓动宣传，经常在群众集会上发表演说，创办报刊，撰写诗歌、小说、杂文和文艺评论文章。

宪章派诗歌题材广泛,有鲜明的政治倾向性。

取材于现实的革命斗争，迅速反映当时斗争中的迫切问题和重要事件，诗歌中充满着乐观主义的精神和激励战斗的号召。

在形式上则广泛采用为广大群众所喜闻乐见的歌谣体和圣诗体,语言通俗易懂。

戴安娜，查尔斯与卡米拉面对感情的选择正如前文所说，戴安娜此时还是个女孩，对爱情心中充满了了期待与向往，在得到王室的接纳之后，她当然心向网之而接受，不论她是否在乎王室的尊贵，但是她心中一定相信自己是嫁给了爱情，嫁给了心中向往的浪漫。

而查尔斯只能打电话给卡米拉，告诉她“戴安娜在王室大获全胜”，然后沉默不言，等着卡米拉的回答，而卡米拉只好选择接受并且还劝告王子不要和自己联系，迎娶戴安娜，两人选择接受现实，却仍然悄悄将那份浪漫存于心中。

查尔斯此时已经选择了现实，但是他没有勇气这样来告诉自己爱恋的情人，只好等她来说出接受现实的话以自我宽慰。

他更不会有勇如前任威尔士亲王一样，放弃江山而去爱美人。

查尔斯此时对戴安娜应该心存期许，但一旦戴妃发现了现实的尖锐，查尔斯隐藏的那份浪漫重新点燃，那么浪漫和尖锐的界限就要重设了。

卡米拉通话时已经面无表情

音乐推荐本集最后是戴安娜被曝光，记者追拍，此时播放的背景音乐正是威尔第的歌剧《茶花女》的序曲《La traviata-Prelude》，序曲也是戴安娜这个童话的开始，但是这个童话是浪漫的理想还是尖锐的现实，最的结局又是否会同茶花女一样，则由时间来回答La traviata - Prelude (茶花女 - 序曲)一个意象，注定的结局

最后要说的就是之前被成功猎杀的公鹿，这个形象从本集开始就出现。

这只鹿有14分叉的鹿角，是皇家级别做鹿头装饰的极品。

它本来属于自然，生活在野外，天生丽质，美丽动人。

但是无意中被猎杀者的捕杀让它一步步进入巴尔莫勒尔堡附近的皇家地域，成为王室捕猎的对象。

结果是戴安娜的出现成功让它落入王室之手，而戴安娜也成为了王室选定的王妃。

美好的事物如此耀眼，以至于人们皆想得之，却造就了其更早的陨灭。

同时菲利普亲王是在屠宰这头鹿的同时告知了查尔斯王室对戴安娜接受的决定，所以王室高兴于获得了鹿的美丽，但是没有想到这本身会成为对鹿的残忍，如鹿角美丽外表婚姻中个人真实的感情又会是怎样的。

查尔斯和妹妹交谈时，妹妹说：“鹿头都被她拿下了，这一切是命中注定”，是的，正如这只鹿一切或许已经注定。

鹿头作为标本可以永久留于眼中，但是她自己只能遥望窗外的风景PS: 无独有偶，在07年的电影《女王》中，讲述戴安娜之死前后，鹿的形象也一直出现，本集编剧极有可能有所借鉴。

（经过指正：二者共享一个编剧hh）

《女王》中女王曾经提醒小鹿快跑、躲避猎杀，但是最终也未逃离死亡的命运第一集主要内容：保守党赢得选举,党魁撒切尔夫人成为首相；蒙巴顿爵士(前任英国海军元帅,东南亚盟军总司令，王室近亲)在捕鱼时因船体爆炸遇害,系爱尔兰共和军所为。

分析下第一集,更多是承上启下,说明英帝国的重重忧患和将要迎来的改变故事开头女王身着军装,高贵且肃穆,与皇室成员一同审阅着军队和接受人民欢呼喝彩,王室依旧保持着帝国表面上曾经的辉煌与光彩

可是形成鲜明对比的是反对声的台词与穿插着暴力冲突的画面:“英国人为什么还在这里(爱尔兰)”“我们采取新的手段的时候到了”“死亡女王”以及北爱尔兰军的暴动(之后剧情该组织影响重大。

自1978年起,围绕北爱尔兰独立的问题,北爱尔兰敌对双方不断冲突、矛盾升级,这也是英国一直以来的忧患)。

撒切尔登场不禁会想问：女王真的这么想吗？

作为君主制的代表以及经过最为传统的贵族环境熏陶，她心里多少会萌生和菲利普一样的想法，但是女王心里十分清楚：不论撒切尔夫人是什么来头，即使被报纸评价为“任性、固执、刚愎自用到了危险的程度”，这个国家现在出现了问题，需要一个这样的改革者。

同时女王她也感同身受居于高位的女性要面临怎样的挑战，而她将自己将应该履行的责任深深镌刻于自己的骨血，作为国家元首独立于党派斗争之外，所以习惯使然说出这样的话。

撒切尔恭敬且缓慢地向女王行了自己不怎么熟悉的礼，两人说了些应有的流程。

正如女王所了解的，撒切尔毫不掩饰地表现出自己的刚毅与政治决断，对女王很是亲切的提问是否在内阁不会留下女性时，撒切尔面对同为女性的元首毫不避讳：绝对不会有女性，因为女性太情绪化不适合居于高位（一不小心就成了双关）。

女王倒是礼貌地回答“我不会的”，并且还轻松地预测了下一届内阁的大部分变化。

撒切尔也称对女王刮目相看，回家后对丈夫道（注意语气）：这女人真聪明，对财政有兴趣，见多识广，热衷工作。

（结合后集可知撒切尔对大多旧贵族保守、不作为的作风一直心存不满）

然而在政治责任与国家安危面前，二人彼此关系怎样发展似乎有点微不足道。

首相是政治的实际最高领导，更是王室必须的依靠。

蒙巴顿遇刺后，女王还未缓过悲伤时，首相便通电女王并坚决表示，政府会向爱尔兰共和军宣战，这份决断犹如当年丘吉尔一样，坚决捍卫与国家荣辱一体的王室的权益与尊严。

戴安娜登场卡米拉一直是王子心里难以忘却的爱人，但是因为未来国王的身份，他注定不能和一个已经离过婚的卡米拉在一起，除非放弃王储身份。

就连曾经真心支持查尔斯做自己的蒙巴顿爵士也倒戈王室，这个如同自己亲生父亲的老者希望他选择一个王室需要的、人民爱戴的女子做王妃，在王室压力和爵士死亡的悲痛、后悔中查尔斯还是选择了妥协，但是和卡米拉依旧藕断丝连。

这时候查尔斯王子偶遇到了表演中饰演一棵树的戴安娜，心里留下了深刻的印象，这位光彩照人的女孩也进入了王室的视线。

可以这样说，戴安娜的出现对查尔斯而言是一道欣喜的光，他如其他人一样被眼前这个有趣、特别又不循规蹈矩的女孩吸引，一方面她特立独行的魅力让自己从王室处处规矩、束缚的生活中感到新鲜与活力，同时更重要的是他心里很快意识这也许是一个可以发展的“王室中意”的对象，后来也打电话想要进一步了解这个女孩的信息：出生贵族, 从未谈过恋爱；单纯漂亮, 年纪小。

王子对戴安娜是以“选妃”的目而交往，同时心存欣赏，但这还远远不到爱情。

（曾经面对记者关于查尔斯与戴安娜是否是爱情的提问，查尔斯本人回答了非常模棱两可的答案） 而戴安娜，面对这位温柔多才还有丝神秘的王子，眼神中一直充满了崇拜和对爱情的憧憬，她还远不知道自己所要面对的王子的全貌和他身后的王室是怎样的一个家庭。

音乐推荐第一集结尾，戴安娜在接收到王室邀请电话前，跳舞用的音乐为《Call Me》，曾为美国冠军单曲，创作和演唱者是70-80年代美国著名的新浪潮乐队“Blondie（金发女郎）”，拥有4支Hot 100冠单。

追剧时发现90s金曲《潇洒走一回》和本歌的前几句基本上是一模一样的，这就是传说中的汉化创（jie）作（jian）？

蒙巴顿遇袭而亡

女王母女、菲利普亲王、查尔斯，纷纷先后捕获了自己的猎物，然而就在蒙巴顿即将收渔网之时，自己成了网中之鱼，爆炸使得船毁人亡。

关于谋杀案的百科——1979年8月27日，蒙巴顿携家人在马勒莫小码头乘坐“幻影五号”游艇捕虾。

一名爱尔兰共和军成员，托马斯·麦克马洪（Thomas McMahon），早时趁船上无人值守时安装了一枚重达50磅（23千克）的炸弹，随后当蒙巴顿一家都上船后，麦克马洪引爆了在船上的的炸弹。

蒙巴顿的双腿被几近炸断，虽然他很快就被附近渔民救起，但在上岸之前就因伤重而死，终年79岁。

同船身亡的还有他14岁的双胞胎外孙之一尼古拉斯·纳奇布尔，他女婿的母亲布拉伯恩女爵，以及船上的15岁爱尔兰籍少年船员保罗·麦克斯韦尔。

爱尔兰共和军则迅速表示对此事负责，且宣称处决蒙巴顿是“为了吸引英国民众对英国政府持续侵占北爱尔兰行为的关注”。

新芬党当时的副党魁盖瑞·亚当斯则称爱尔兰共和军对蒙巴顿的谋杀行动“恰恰是蒙巴顿一生都在对他人做的事”。

同时蒙巴顿的死也向其他很多集一样，时不时提醒我们王室亲情的特殊性。

原来蒙巴顿很早就准备了自己的葬礼计划，他要求自己的悼辞由查尔斯来朗诵，于是做父亲的菲利普亲王他酸了，他酸了！

菲利普年轻来英国后，蒙巴顿将军对其而言如兄如父，教会了他太多。

而随着查尔斯的长大，这位老将军的爱从亲王转移到了查尔斯身上，开始支持查尔斯自己内心的冲动与想法。

然而当蒙巴顿站在王室希望查尔斯承担自己与生俱来的责任磨砺自己、并放弃卡米拉而“选妃”时，查尔斯却没有执行来试图反抗。

而亲人已去，面对父亲的质疑，查尔斯内心愈发内疚后悔，也展现出他本怯懦的状态。

这也进一步促进他接受命运对自己婚姻的安排。

第一集的名称是Gold Stick，即镀金的手杖，由某些王室成员在国家场合佩戴，Stick作动词也有坚持之意，正如第一季中王太后所说的：The crown must win, must always win。

第一集是在提问也是简介：王室同君主制度在本季如何继续坚持发展下去，国家经济政治随着新的政府将迎来怎样的未来。

以下都是个人的看法，欢迎来喷第四季的一大焦点无疑是如何处理戴安娜王妃事件，我觉得编剧处理的很好，甚至有些偏戴安娜王妃。

即便戴安娜过世已经这么久了，我还是会称呼她为戴安娜王妃。

记得戴安娜王妃过世时，我还在上小学。

并不清楚她是谁，当时的英语老师是个狄更斯迷，也算是个英国通吧，当然比还是小孩子的我们要通很多。

记得有两周的英语课都在讲戴安娜王妃的生平，为其鸣不平。

其善良，魅力，优雅深深植入人心了。

当时各种阴谋论，渣男论甚嚣尘上，几乎成了主流。

当二十来年后，看到这一季，也因为生活的历练，有了一番对戴安娜王妃的际遇翻天覆地的看法。

要先说造成戴安娜王妃不幸结局的，我觉得主要是女王，舆论，查尔斯和戴安娜王妃自己。

影响占比也是女王<舆论<查尔斯<戴安娜王妃先说说女王，女王陛下估计是，把当下所有国家元首政客都算上，最值得尊重的人了。

其中有很冷血的一幕，就是澳洲之行后戴安娜王妃找女王哭诉查尔斯对自己的不忠甚至侮辱。

而女王的反应是，是不是你戴安娜有些逾制了，请允许我使用这个词。

这让我联想到上一季，女王平息蒙巴顿勋爵政变时，当面对勋爵勋爵的问题，“如果我的国家正在被政府往错误的道路上带，我们还能视而不理么”，女王的回答，堪称最大的政治智慧，“我们王室能做的就是什么都不做，等选举它的人民再把它选下去”。

让人想到先秦时代的老庄政治哲学，相比以无为求有为的老子思想，无疑女王的思想更趋近以无为求无为的庄子。

这就导致女王几乎在public事物上几乎不能有任何表态，同时女王也是一个有情绪障碍人格的人，作为一个人格统一的人，无疑对内对外的事物上的态度上都要保持相对一致。

作为人，在对人对事上不可能没有偏重，如果想一碗水端平，那就是在不触犯原则的情况下，啥都不做，少做少错，不做不错。

有一幕女王和爱丁堡公爵谈论谁是自己最爱的孩子，女王竟然想不出谁是自己最喜欢的孩子，可见无为的意识已经深入血液了。

这也导致女王认为在戴安娜王妃的事情上，没有做任何干涉，认为其应该站好自己的位置，承担自己的责任插一嘴，如果你是个有过多年婚姻经历的人，你应该会感触良多。

爱丁堡公爵和女王对婚姻的处理，堪称教科书式的，松弛有度，女王也是以无为的方式处理的，有机会可以展开来说。

所以说由于女王的伟大，什么都不做无疑给了无助的戴安娜王妃很大的打击。

再说说舆论上，当时可以说一边倒的支持戴安娜王妃，可是这与宫廷的规矩和运作是格格不入的。

可以说舆论越支持，可能越导致戴安娜王妃最终的不行，因为当时的舆论力量不比今天，还不足以完全影响宫廷的运转的制度。

作用力越大反作用力就越大，就越使戴安娜王妃远离王室。

再说说当事人之一，查尔斯吧当我看到成年查尔斯的演员时，我觉得，这个剧选角简直绝了，那种优柔寡断，多愁善感，脆弱，没勇气，智慧善良，都从演员的脸上展现出来了，几乎不用演。

如果倒回20年，最适合演查尔斯的，我觉得，可能就是老友记里的Ross了，哈哈

碰巧ross也是一生只爱一个这选角堪比马景涛饰演张无忌。

查尔斯是个渣男么？

我觉得不完全算，只能算是个优柔寡断，拎不清的人。

一生只喜欢卡米拉，说实话，到现在我都没法理解卡米拉哪儿优秀。

哈哈，可能这就是爱吧。

但限于王室的规矩，只能造就几个家庭的不幸。

就是因为他的软弱。

其实有时候，处理关系问题可能比处理国家事物更棘手。

我是觉得剧集中，应该是比较偏袒戴安娜王妃了，这也无可厚非。

毕竟死者为大，不幸的婚姻，双方都是有责任的，而且他们的结合不仅仅是为了婚姻。

最后说说戴安娜王妃，我觉得可以类比一下爱丁堡公爵，年轻时的菲利普也曾苦恼，挣扎。

埋怨自己的婚姻，自己的妻子，女王不能像对待丈夫般的对待自己。

但最后公爵明白了，也许是屈服了，认清了自己的位置，你的工作就是保护女王。

戴安娜王妃也有类似的问题，但不同的是，相比她的公公婆婆，戴安娜王妃相较之下，比查尔斯强势太多了，政治能力也强太多了，这和容易造成“逾制”的危机。

她们既是夫妇，也是君臣。

我记得女王在他们成婚前的一大担忧就是，“她太年轻了”。

年轻的不足以handle自己的位置，即使聪明如戴安娜王妃。

但另一面，她无能的丈夫似乎很能拎的清自己的位置。

为什么说戴安娜王妃自己有最大的责任造成自己的不幸？

有句老话，“道儿都是自己走的”。

活在王室，不可能你既享有荣誉和资源，还能向往自由，追求人性的美好。

正应了我最喜欢的政治人物之一，撒切尔夫人说的，“他们既不高雅，也不高贵”。

翻译成人话就是，王室就不是人能呆的，完全是一群妖怪。

其实自打戴安娜王妃走进王宫那一天，就注定了悲剧。

其实这一季的情节大家都很熟悉，毕竟离我们很近，历史课角度其实能学的不多。

我反而对这几位大人物处理家庭，儿女事物的情节，台词设计，演员表演都特别考究，真实。

再大的人物，处理家务事时也是满头的问好，没有什么神秘的。

还有就是姑娘们想要幸福的生活，尽量远离所谓上流社会，真不是人呆的，哈哈😄

看完这个剧就明白了要坐稳王位你不能是个感情丰沛好奇心重的可爱人儿。

你不要是个人，你得是一个系统，一套算法。

在已有的条件下找最优解，而不是打破和革新。

女王大人之所以王位坐得久就是因为她没有多少同理心，这个特点上一季矿难已经讲过了。

当她在最后一集郑重地为被迫下台的撒彻尔带上小奖章时，很像游戏结束时那个评价星级的系统。

她厌恶地看着向她求助的戴安娜和查尔斯，拒绝任何让自己产生感情困扰的因素。

她已经超越了个人，成为一个长期运行的系统。

周围的那些家人朝臣只是女王的人间外挂，无论有没有他们，她都会代表国家运行下去。

不要用普通人的视角评判女王 。

原文链接The fourth season of The Crown stretches from May 1979, when Margaret Thatcher is elected Britain’s first female prime minister, to Christmas 1990, shortly after she has been drummed out of office. Peter Morgan, the show’s creator, tells us: “We do our very, very best to get it right, but sometimes I have to conflate [incidents] . . . You sometimes have to forsake accuracy, but you must never forsake truth.” The forsaking of the truth, the perverting and twisting of known facts, is what has always concerned me throughout the four seasons of this series. It is about real people, often put into fictional situations.The main protagonists in season four are Thatcher and the Prince and Princess of Wales, clashed against some of the other characters from season three and earlier. This creates a new problem for anyone watching it since in both these relationships there are numerous contradictions, there has been much side-taking and it is possible to slant things in a variety of different ways. Nevertheless, even having taken that into consideration, there are established truths and untruths. My conclusion on this series is that it is yet more subtly divisive than earlier seasons. Pretty much every character is dislikeable. The Queen is portrayed as glum and schoolmistressly — quite unlike the real Queen. The Queen Mother is given some truly horrible lines; Princess Margaret is downright rude; Thatcher buttoned up. Diana is the heroine of this series, largely portrayed — in my view often unfairly — as the victim of a heartless family.Episode 1Did Lord Mountbatten write Prince Charles a letter urging him to settle down, on the day he set out for his ill-fated boating expedition at Mullaghmore?❌ FALSEThe Crown shows Lord Mountbatten on holiday at Classiebawn Castle, Co Sligo, on the morning of August 27, 1979, about to set off on a fishing trip with his daughter and other members of his family. He writes Prince Charles a letter urging him to find “some sweet and innocent, well-tempered girl with no past” to settle down with, and to do his duty. In reality, he wrote no such letter that day.He did, however, write to Prince Charles on many other occasions offering him advice, and many similar letters exist. Mountbatten was by no means a good influence. He urged Prince Charles to “sow his wild oats” before finding the unsullied girl. It’s true also that Charles held Mountbatten in high esteem. Mountbatten, it should be noted, was blown up at Mullaghmore by the IRA before Lady Diana Spencer came on the scene.Episode 2Do the Queen and the royal family lay secret protocol traps for hapless visitors to test them when they come and stay at Balmoral? Did they apply this to Thatcher?❌ FALSEThe Queen and the royal family go out of their way to make their guests feel at ease at Balmoral. In real life, Mr and Mrs Thatcher arrived at the castle on Saturday, September 8, 1979, a mere three days after Lord Mountbatten’s ceremonial funeral at Westminster Abbey. No hint of that in this episode of The Crown. It has to be 1979 because clearly they have never been before. But unlike what is shown in The Crown, there was no torturing of Thatcher, no maids being superciliously rude to her, no wrong-footing in silly games, no making her ill at ease for wearing the wrong clothes or shoes, and no, Thatcher did not plead pressure of work in London and leave early.In The Crown Diana too is invited to Balmoral to be checked out and succeeds and passes the tests, which Thatcher failed. Diana’s visit was, in fact, a year later, in 1980, and at a time when the Queen was not there.Was Thatcher berated by Princess Margaret for sitting in Queen Victoria’s chair at Balmoral — a chair in which no one must sit?✅ PARTLY TRUEA scene shows Thatcher retreating from a stalking expedition and working at a desk, where Princess Margaret strays across her. She berates her for sitting in Queen Victoria’s chair. It is true that there is a chair at Balmoral that no one should sit in — a winged armchair that was indeed Queen Victoria’s. It is in one of the drawing rooms, and about ten years ago the Queen had it moved to a place where people would not easily reach it. Queen Victoria was very tiny, so had Thatcher used it at her desk her chin would have been where her elbows should have been.Episode 3Was Thatcher out of place when staying at Balmoral?✅ TRUEThatcher was not particularly interested in country pursuits, but she went to Balmoral quite happily for the traditional stay by the prime minister in the late summer of each year. After the first Balmoral visit in 1979 her husband, Denis, wrote a letter, later quoted by their daughter, Carol: “There was a house party and some of the people who’d been shooting didn’t come in until later and then there were more drinks — because they’re very generous with drink — and then we went in for dinner. In their language it’s probably very informal but nevertheless you’re on tiptoe. There’s the usual sort of after-dinner conversation over coffee and then the Queen withdraws fairly early . . .”Did Prince Philip summon Prince Charles to the hanging room at Balmoral to command him to marry Diana?❌ FALSEThe Crown suggests that Prince Philip carpeted Prince Charles after the visit Diana supposedly made there in 1979. Presumably the film-makers chose the hanging room, where they skin the wildlife, to emphasise the idea of lambs to the slaughter. No, Prince Philip did not arrange such an encounter. The truth is that Diana began to be pursued by the press in the autumn of 1980, when the media got a hint that she might be Prince Charles’s future bride. She ran the gauntlet of photographers every time she left her flat in Coleherne Court, Earls Court.Aware of this, Prince Philip wrote to Prince Charles either late in 1980 or maybe early in 1981. Jonathan Dimbleby wrote in his authorised biography of “an intervention from the Duke of Edinburgh”, which had “a powerful if not a decisive impact”. The letter warned Prince Charles that he should decide one way or the other because he was risking damaging Diana’s reputation. Prince Charles interpreted this as “an ultimatum”, which was not the original intent. Thus, in a “confused and anxious state of mind”, the prince went ahead and proposed to Diana in early February 1981.Did Prince Charles really leave for Highgrove immediately after his engagement was announced, the presumption being that he would be seeing Camilla Parker Bowles, who lived near by?❌ FALSEThe Crown depicts those famous embarrassing lines by Prince Charles in the engagement interview at Buckingham Palace: “Whatever love means.” In real life Diana laughed nervously. In The Crown she looks cross. They have Prince Charles departing immediately afterwards for Highgrove, his Gloucestershire home, by implication to see Camilla. In fact, Charles and Diana dined with the Queen Mother at Clarence House that evening, which was also where Diana was staying.In this episode of The Crown, having seen Camilla, Charles then flies off — the very next day — on his official Antipodean tour. No. The engagement was announced on February 24, 1981. He flew to New Zealand on March 29, more than a month later, then on to Australia, Venezuela and the United States.Were the royal family beastly to Diana after her engagement, accusing her of not knowing to whom she should curtsey and making a clumsy entry into their midst?❌ FALSEWe see Diana arriving at Buckingham Palace and coming into a room filled with the royal family and bungling the curtseys. Princess Margaret tears a strip off her and they appear to mock her. This is spiteful rubbish. Diana had been brought up in the shadow of Sandringham, at Park House. Her two grandmothers and four great-aunts were in the Queen Mother’s household. Her father had been equerry to the Queen on the 1953-54 Commonwealth tour. She knew precisely what to do.Was Diana really clueless about royal protocol?❌ FALSEWe see Diana being instructed in many royal customs by her grandmother, Ruth, Lady Fermoy. Lady Fermoy is portrayed as a harridan. In real life she was much gentler (at least on the surface). Not only did Diana not need instruction in that way, but the nonsense the screen version Ruth Fermoy tells her granddaughter is risible. HRHs do not curtsey to each other. There is only one Page of the Backstairs etc.Diana did get advice about her new role from the four men in Prince Charles’s private office — Edward Adeane, Francis Cornish, Michael Colborne and Oliver Everett. Later in life she liked to claim that she was given no help.Was Diana cooped up in Buckingham Palace during the months before the wedding?✅ TRUEIn The Crown we see Diana dancing alone to her Walkman, rollerskating in the state rooms and confronted with trolley-loads of flowers and letters from the public. It’s here we first see her bulimia. As soon as she was engaged, the real Diana left her flat in Earls Court, first went to Clarence House, then moved to Buckingham Palace a few days later. She lived there for about five months until her marriage in July.The palace is more of a huge office/Edwardian hotel than a cosy home, and it is understandable that she felt gloomy there. The contrast to her life with her flatmates and this new life must have been sharp. One of the pages, working there at the time and looking after her, used to go out and buy her takeaways. So the loneliness and isolation portrayed in The Crown is accurate. It is also true that Diana did not see Prince Charles much before the wedding. She called him “Sir” until the day he proposed.Did Camilla Parker Bowles and Diana have lunch while Prince Charles was away in Australia?✅ TRUEThey did lunch together, according to one of Charles and Diana’s biographers, Sally Bedell Smith. Camilla wished to help her. However, Diana interpreted the motive for the lunch as being to establish that she would be mainly in London, leaving Highgrove and Gloucestershire and hunting as Camilla’s territory.All evidence suggests that whatever he may have wished, Prince Charles was perfectly aware that his relationship with Camilla had to stop when he got engaged, and that this was understood by all concerned. As Dimbleby put it: “Now that he was engaged to be married there was, and there would be, no other woman in his life.” Diana went into St Paul’s Cathedral for her wedding with her head down, and came out with her head up. She was now his wife, and genuinely hoped she could make him happy.Did Prince Charles give Camilla a special bracelet before his and Diana’s wedding?✅ TRUEIn The Crown we see Diana coming across the designs for a bracelet that the Prince of Wales intends to give his mistress shortly before the wedding. It is marked with the initials “F&G”, which Diana told her author, Andrew Morton, she thought stood for “Fred” and “Gladys” — Charles and Camilla’s pet names for each other.In reality, in the run-up to the wedding, the four private secretaries in Prince Charles’s private office became aware that Diana was preoccupied by suspicions concerning the prince’s relationship with Camilla. A bracelet was commissioned as a way of the prince saying goodbye. It had the initials “GF”, which stood for “Girl Friday”. Diana discovered the bracelet. She confronted Prince Charles and was not mollified. Nevertheless, he felt he should hand over the bracelet in person. The Dimbleby-authorised version is that this was the only time he saw Camilla between his engagement and the day of his wedding.Diana later told Morton that photos of Camilla spewed out of her husband’s wallet on their honeymoon. She believed that his relationship with Camilla never ceased. Clearly there were acute differences between the newlyweds right from the start of the marriage. On their honeymoon on Britannia, Diana chatted up the sailors and cooks, and he remained, as he wrote at the time, “hermit-like on the verandah deck, sunk with pure joy into one of Laurens van der Post’s books . . .”Episode 4Did Prince Charles call Camilla every day during the early years of his marriage to Diana?❌ FALSEPrince Charles had virtually no contact with Camilla at all for the first five years. Yet since Andrew Parker Bowles (the husband of Camilla) was commanding officer of the Household Cavalry Mounted Regiment from 1981 to 1983, then colonel commanding the Household Cavalry and Silver Stick from 1987 to 1990, there must have been a few formal encounters. Dimbleby dates the resumption of contact between them to 1986, by which time Charles’s marriage had, as he put it, “irretrievably broken down”.Did Mark Thatcher cause a national crisis when he got lost in the desert during a car race? Was he Thatcher’s favourite child?✅ TRUEThe Crown shows Mark Thatcher setting off in the Paris-Dakar car rally in January 1982. We see Thatcher in tears at her audience with the Queen telling her he has gone missing.This did happen. Mark Thatcher got stuck in the Sahara desert in Algeria for four days, and although he was not lost, nobody knew where he was. There were fears that he had been kidnapped. Thatcher was deeply upset and was seen in tears when the press asked her about the disappearance. President Mitterrand of France offered military support. Denis Thatcher was loaned a plane and after a 31-hour search young Mark was located. Denis was none too impressed with his son, not least for the casual response he made to the massive rescue operation.The Crown stresses that Mark was Thatcher’s favourite of her twins. This is confirmed by her daughter, Carol, in the biography she wrote about her father: “The rest of us could relax a little because Mark had hung an ‘occupied’ sign on the family’s ‘embarrassing relative’ slot.”Did Princess Anne resent the popularity of the Princess of Wales, and the lack of publicity she herself got in the media?❌ FALSEThis season implies that Princess Anne minded the easy publicity the Princess of Wales received just for wearing a new outfit, when she was a hard-working member of the royal family who got none. The truth is that Princess Anne did not care one iota about that. She never sought publicity or public approbation, a quality she shared with the Queen and Prince Philip. In fact, the arrival of Diana was liberating for Princess Anne. No longer was she meant to fulfil a role as a romantic, fairytale princess in the eyes of the media — she could be what she naturally was, a successful and highly executive princess.Episode 5How true was the depiction of Michael Fagan, the intruder who found his way into the Queen’s bedroom?✅ TRUEIt was a great shock to the nation to hear, in July 1982, that a man had twice scaled the walls of Buckingham Palace, and that on the second occasion security had been so lax that he had found his way into the Queen’s bedroom. Fortunately he had no malign intent, otherwise it could have been a great deal more serious.We don’t know the Queen’s version, but Fagan has described what happened, and The Crown’s events are close to a faithful representation of what happened — the two break-ins, him drinking the wine and later his confrontation with the Queen. Along with the June 1981 firing of blanks at the Queen in The Mall (an incident ignored by the makers of The Crown), this shows the Queen’s courage and adroit handling of what must have been a terrifying experience.Did Thatcher usurp the Queen’s position by taking the salute at the Falklands victory parade?✅ TRUEIn this episode Thatcher has an audience with the Queen telling her about the successful end of the Falklands conflict, then announces that she is off to attend the victory parade at Mansion House, where she, instead of the Queen, takes the salute. It did not happen exactly like that, of course.Stanley was taken back on June 14, 1982. The parade actually took place in London several months later, on October 12. However, Thatcher did attend, while the Queen did not, because she was on a tour of the South Pacific at the time. There were definitely hints in the media at the time that Thatcher was becoming presidential in her approach.Episode 6The Prince and Princess of Wales went on a tour of Australia and New Zealand in March 1983. Did Diana throw a tantrum and demand to change all the tour plans so as not to be separated from baby Prince William?❌ FALSEIt was a new idea for the Waleses to bring baby William with them on tour. Diana did not wish to be separated from her son, born the previous summer. But, no, the tour was not rearranged. In order that they could be with William, the outgoing Australian prime minister, Malcolm Fraser (who lost the election just before the visit), asked a well-known philanthropist, Gordon Darling, to lend them his sheep station, Woomargama, which was situated between Sydney and Melbourne and close to Canberra (by Australian standards). Albury airport was near by and they were able to fly everywhere, returning each night to be with the baby.They took about 27 flights during their visit. The Waleses stayed at Woomargama from March 20 to April 17 and they had an entourage of 23 British staff travelling with them, including a private chef. Those staff who stayed at Woomargama made a significant dent in Darling’s cellar.Did Prince Charles feel overshadowed by Diana on that trip?✅ PARTLY TRUEThis was one of the early examples of “Di-mania”, but since the Waleses were getting along well and the trip was considered a great success, the prince was more concerned as to how it would affect her. She was partly elated and partly exhausted. He wrote that she was a great support to him at times when he felt gloomy.There was certainly a part of him that did not like being upstaged by his wife. At this time his annoyance was matched by his pride in her, but it is true that later on he came to resent how people were only interested in her clothes, and thus did not listen to his speeches.Did Bob Hawke, the republican prime minister of Australia, refer to the Queen as “a pig in twin set and pearls in charge of a herd of prime beef cattle”?❌ FALSEIn The Crown Bob Hawke is portrayed as a rabid republican, hoping a visit by an out-of-touch and unremarkable Prince Charles would lead to the removal of the monarch as head of state of Australia. His plans are thwarted by the public’s thrall in Princess Diana.Yes, Hawke was an avowed republican, but there was no appetite for change to a republic in 1983. Hawke got on well with the Queen due to a shared interest in racing. He would never have referred to Prince Charles as a “jug-eared bonehead”, nor made jokes at a press conference: “You wouldn’t put a pig in charge of a herd of prime beef cattle — even if it did look good in a twin set and pearls.”Episode 7Did the Queen sideline Princess Margaret when Prince Edward came of age?❌ FALSEIn The Crown we see the Queen and her private secretary, Sir Martin Charteris, informing Princess Margaret that Prince Edward has come of age and she would no longer be eligible to serve as a Counsellor of State. To explain — six Counsellors of State are appointed to act on her behalf while the monarch is abroad (or incapacitated). Only two of them actually act — and they do so in tandem.While it is true that from March 1985 Princess Margaret could no longer be a Counsellor of State (which did disappoint her because she had enjoyed doing it), it made absolutely no difference to her other royal duties. This episode exaggerates this to imply that Princess Margaret’s role as a working member of the royal family had come to an end.Another point — Sir Martin retired in 1977 and became provost of Eton. But he stays on right through season four. By 1990 he would have been 77, but his actor does not age. He remains as youthful as ever — looking about 45.Were the Queen’s cousins put away in a state lunatic asylum to save the monarchy?❌ FALSEThis has no basis in truth. In this episode Princess Margaret visits a therapist due to her “sidelining” and is told of the existence of her two cousins shut away in Earlswood mental hospital. In real life she took no interest in them.Next they have the Queen Mother telling Princess Margaret that these girls had to be shut away because had it been known that they existed, it would have had serious consequences for the monarchy after the abdication. The implication is that the world may have feared that a strain of lunacy had entered the family.The reality was that these two girls and three cousins had inherited a defective gene from the Trefusis family from which all five descended through their mothers. Nerissa and Katherine were the daughters of Fenella Trefusis, who married the Queen Mother’s brother, Jock Bowes Lyon, so this had nothing to do with the Queen Mother’s bloodline.Episode 8Did Thatcher defy the Queen’s wishes for sanctions to be imposed on South Africa?✅ TRUEIn 1985 48 countries of the Commonwealth wanted to impose sanctions on South Africa, but Thatcher did not wish to do so. As head of the Commonwealth, the Queen was inclined to support the 48. In this episode they concentrate on the differences between the sovereign and the British prime minister. On this there were obvious differences.The Queen was dedicated to the Commonwealth, one of the most important missions of her reign. Thatcher was not keen on it, and preferred to focus on good relations with the United States. On this issue Thatcher saw no merit in sanctions, believing that they hardened opposition rather than reduced it. The episode ends with one of the explanatory captions they sometimes employ — Nelson Mandela ending apartheid and crediting sanctions with making that possible.Did the Queen wish the world to know that she thought Thatcher was “uncaring”, and was she therefore responsible for placing a story in The Sunday Times expressing this?❌ FALSEHere they paint the Queen’s press secretary, Michael Shea, as an honourable man who would never betray the Queen or in any way impugn her political impartiality. In this episode, set in July 1986, the Queen tells Shea that just for once she wants her views known. Therefore, unwillingly apparently, he talks to journalists and the story breaks in The Sunday Times with the (real) headline. “Queen Dismayed by ‘Uncaring’ Thatcher”. The ensuing furore is such that Sir Martin Charteris (who in real life had long retired, remember) sacrifices Shea, telling him to resign and take the blame because a scalp is needed to divert the media from the Queen.The reverse was the case. Shea took it upon himself to talk to The Sunday Times. He then denied that he had done so, and when finally forced to own up, stated that he had been misrepresented. The Palace got rid of him by securing him a job with Hanson plc. What Shea had done was to relay his personal dislike of Thatcher’s policies to the world.The story of Shea has been exposed by many distinguished authors, not least Charles Moore in his authorised biography of Margaret Thatcher.Episode 9Was Prince Charles irritated by Diana’s surprise dance with Wayne Sleep at Covent Garden in 1985, which she intended as his 37th birthday gift?✅ TRUEThere was a private gala at Covent Garden in December 1985 (for some reason they say November, and no it wasn’t for his birthday) and at a certain point Diana slipped away and suddenly appeared on stage with Wayne Sleep and danced to Billy Joel’s Uptown Girl. This was meant to be a gift to her husband, but he took it amiss (an incident omitted from Dimbleby’s authorised biography). Sleep got the impression that Prince Charles was somewhat put out, instead of touched. In this episode Charles berates Diana with some ferocity.Did the tragic avalanche in Klosters in 1988 in which Hugh Lindsay was killed impact on the Waleses’ marriage to the point that Charles decided that he had to get out of it while Diana was determined that it should continue?❌ FALSEOn a holiday in Klosters, Prince Charles, Hugh Lindsay (an equerry to the Queen and his friend), a respected guide and Patty Palmer-Tomkinson went skiing off-piste. They encountered an avalanche in which Major Lindsay lost his life. According to this episode, the tragedy inspires Prince Charles to the conclusion that he wants to get out of his marriage and unite with Camilla, even though she is still married. Meanwhile, Diana declares that Charles’s near death makes her realise how much she would have missed him, so she declares that she wants to make it work.There is mention of the affair she had with James Hewitt and they suggest that she has dropped him. In fact, it wasn’t until 1992 that Prince Charles considered separation. And in real life the Princess of Wales blamed Prince Charles for this accident by taking Lindsay off-piste. She refused ever to return to Klosters and was dismayed that he did.Were Charles and Camilla meeting regularly at Highgrove by 1988?✅ TRUEAccording to the evidence, Charles and Camilla were seeing each other again by 1986. This series takes the Diana line that Charles and Camilla were in touch all the way through the marriage. Viewers should be cautious to accept this without question. They will see an angry Prince Charles, sometimes yelling at his wife, aggressive and demeaning to her. What is largely omitted is any account of Diana’s well-documented distressing behaviour, including tantrums and insecurities. The Crown clearly presents a one-sided portrait of the marriage.Were there several meetings between the Queen and the Waleses to discuss the crumbling marriage?❌ FALSEVarious meetings are shown in which the Queen discusses the predicament in which the Waleses found themselves and tells them to pull themselves together. In reality these did not take place. Until Prince Charles realised that Diana had been directly involved in the publication of Morton’s book, Diana – Her True Story, in the summer of 1992, he maintained a façade, and the hope that there was a way for the marriage to continue in some way or another.The Dimbleby line on this was that the royal family were aware of “the princess’s distress”, but did not wish to interfere. So there was no summit meeting with the Queen, Prince Philip and the Waleses until June 1992.Episode 10Did Thatcher try to get the Queen to dissolve parliament to save her skin at the time of the leadership crisis in 1990?❌ FALSEOf course Thatcher did no such thing. It is well known that when Geoffrey Howe resigned and delivered his devastating resignation piece (faithfully shown by The Crown), Thatcher faced a challenge to her leadership from Michael Heseltine. The outfall for that is well shown — the meetings with ministers, her gradual realisation that she must go, but then they introduce this nonsense.In The Crown they have her telling Denis that she has one card up her sleeve. So she goes to see the Queen and asks her to dissolve parliament and therefore call a general election. Theoretically she could have done that, and technically the Queen could refuse. But it never happened, nor would it have done.Was the Queen angry when Thatcher was ousted by her ministers in 1990?✅ TRUEThere is a genuinely moving scene in The Crown in which the Queen summons Thatcher to see her, and she presents her with the Order of Merit. I remember being told at the time that the Queen was not pleased by the way they got rid of Thatcher. So the line “I was shocked by the way in which you were forced to leave office” is spot-on. People have persisted in thinking the Queen and Thatcher did not get on. The Order of Merit is in her personal gift, as is clearly explained here, and her gift of it is evidence of her respect for her first female prime minister. Thatcher was surprised and delighted to be offered it.If further evidence is required, the Queen appointed her a Lady Companion of the Order of the Garter in 1995 — again her personal gift. She attended her 70th and 80th birthday parties and was present at her funeral in St Paul’s Cathedral in 2013. The only other prime minister whose funeral the Queen has attended was that of Sir Winston Churchill in 1965.Did Prince Philip try to comfort Diana during a miserable Christmas at Sandringham, then threaten her that it “wouldn’t end well” if she left her marriage?❌ FALSEIt is true that by 1990 Sandringham Christmases were something of a strain for Diana, but she was there to be with her boys. In this episode Prince Philip visits her in her room for a comforting conversation. She tells him that if Prince Charles and the royal family can’t give her the love and security she deserves, then she will have no option but to break away officially. He advises her not to with the ominous words: “Let’s just say — I can’t see it ending well for you.” To which she responds: “I hope that isn’t a threat, sir.”In truth, the real Prince Philip did intervene to help Diana, but not until the summer of 1992, when the royal marriage became a crisis after Morton’s book. There was an exchange of letters between them. He did everything he could to find a way to keep the marriage intact. There was not a hint of a threat in any of them (I have read them).The Queen is shown in several episodes in a magnificent uniform for various Birthday Parades (Trooping the Colour). Did they get that right?❌ FALSEIn the opening sequence of The Crown the Queen is shown in the uniform of colonel-in-chief, Grenadier Guards — a grenade on the collar, a white plume in her cap and buttons in ones. She wears the Garter riband and star. It pops up in several episodes.The first trooping portrayed was June 1979, when it was the colour of the Scots Guards being trooped, so they have dressed her in the wrong uniform — it should have been a thistle on the collar, no plume, and buttons in threes. When the Scots Guards colour is trooped, she wears the dark green riband and star of the Thistle. At the 1979 trooping Prince Philip also wore the green Thistle riband. In The Crown he wears the Garter.At the 1982 trooping the Queen is shown riding along as a grenadier again, so a grenade on the collar, and buttons in ones. But this time they give her the plume of the Welsh Guards (white/green/white). It should have been a Coldstream Guards uniform, a Garter star on the collar, a red plume and buttons in twos. With their massive budget and their various advisers, the film-makers could so easily have tweaked these and got them right.In real life the Queen had five separate Guards uniforms, one for each of the five regiments of which she was colonel-in-chief — Grenadier, Coldstream, Scots, Irish and Welsh (in that order).

这个剧评，并不能单纯视为是第四季的评论，更多是追剧三年的一些个人感想。

关于戴安娜，虽然我在小时候就听过这位王妃的芳名，但真正对她有了解的兴趣是在知道《王冠》要拍摄与她有关的内容后，我对这位王妃的感受一直不算太好，虽然网络上对她的称赞比比皆是，但之前认为她并不十分美貌，所以不大在意“英伦玫瑰”这种美称，至于其悲剧的婚姻，无论是了解之前还是之后，始终认为“可怜”“受害者”这种理由只能让人同情，远远不能让人喜爱。

目前我对戴安娜王妃的态度依然是“中立”，既不褒扬或崇拜，也不去批评。

首先是她的原生家庭，“平民王妃”这种谣言应该早就被打碎，斯宾塞百年贵族不论如何与“灰姑娘”“麻雀”都不沾边，“平民王妃”的说法可能源于“人民的王妃”，后者五字可谓真知著见，戴安娜的确极受英国人民爱戴，而且这种爱戴的理由并不肤浅，前者是不知所云，“灰姑娘”可以解释她身为一个土气的普通lady，突然被放到世界舞台上倍受瞩目，但是英国本身从未实行过贵庶婚姻，也不存在“prince”必须娶“princess”这种规则，贵庶婚姻广泛实施于德国一带的王室，英国是真的存在“平民百姓”做王后这种旧例的，虽然很长时间里一直是王子公主通婚为主流，但与本国贵族结婚也不存在任何王室婚姻规则问题。

戴安娜婚姻的悲剧，我认为她的父母（原生家庭）要对此负一定责任。

不是一方出轨就叫悲剧，她婚姻很多不幸是因为她没有很正确地面对这个问题，她在一开始选择婚姻时就知道卡米拉的存在（当然她的不幸不仅是卡米拉代表的夫妻情感关系问题），但她没有更审慎地去面对。

之后她也一直用自虐、逃避来解决问题。

她的父母不仅没有示范、教她如何处理与看待个人情感，而是在她年仅18岁，思虑不成熟却又要面对王室婚姻的时候，也没有给予过有用的关怀或帮助，或者是关心她的感情问题，劝慰她更理智地对待，反而一直是她的朋友在她周围，在影片中她的两位grandma，也没有任何正面引导（现实详见后）。

戴安娜选择与查尔斯结婚（明知双方了解与感情不够多且对方另有情人），本身就是不明智的，但是明知她只有18岁，却毫不为她未来生活作着想，只想让她成为王妃，这种明明知道不少成人规则却让她往火坑里跳的人物也颇可憎。

王室一方，是认为查尔斯年届三十，该娶妻生子，以催婚的态度，抓住一位资质合格的女士，自然希望查尔斯与此女缔结婚姻，不过是与现代大多数儿女已达婚龄的家长一样，单方面热情满满，无关这女士内心如何，未来何方，当太子妃还有不愿的事吗？

儿子虽有蚊子血，可以一般心境揣度，一个不好看的已婚妇女在心头又能鲜艳几年，威尔士亲王拈花惹草也是正常事件，身为女人本就该忍则忍，作为储妃更该大局为先。

“喜欢不喜欢”，在普通家庭考虑婚配时仿佛也在物质条件之后，何况王室，再者查尔斯对戴安娜也并不完全不爱，戴安娜漂亮性格好，迟早查尔斯回心转意会当合格丈夫好男人，只要一切皆控制有序，就是稳定家庭。

一个当今不少豪门还奉行的婚姻模式，放到80年代的英王室，也不算十分丑恶用心，只是完全走错方向，“不明智”。

戴安娜的原生家庭生母戴安娜生母讳弗朗西斯•露丝，弗朗西斯是第四代弗莫伊男爵莫里斯•罗什之女，莫里斯是乔治六世的朋友，还是第三代弗莫伊男爵詹姆斯与“百万美元公主”，弗朗西斯·埃伦（与《纯真年代》女主Ellen同名）·沃克之子。

美国的这位弗朗西斯小姐，其家庭在纽约地位十分之高，是阿斯特夫人400位有幸参加舞厅盛宴的宾客之一（阿斯特夫人之子是瑞吉酒店创始人，阿斯特家族另一成员威廉创建了华尔道夫），乃真正上流名媛，家族朋友有范德比尔特。

她与詹姆斯成婚11年，生下两女两子，之后离婚（又是一场婚姻不幸），当时男方尚未袭爵。

离婚8年后，詹姆斯成为了国会议员，又起诉妻子要求要回女儿的抚养权，理由是她触犯了“人身保护令”，剥夺了女儿的自由，而弗朗西斯的律师是美国前国务卿托马斯·F·贝亚德，最终以庭外和解收场。

这场闹剧14年后，弗朗西斯与一匈牙利裔骑手再婚，2年后又起诉离婚，理由是如果二人还在一起，她父亲富兰克林·H·沃克就要剥夺她的财产继承权。

这次离婚4年后【1911】，她父亲去世，为她与她的孩子、她的姊妹留下了近1500万美元的遗产，并声明不能分给前女婿詹姆斯·伯克·罗什。

至于弗朗西斯•露丝，她的母亲，露丝·西尔维娅·罗什，片中出现过，是王太后的女官，有大英帝国勋章、维多利亚女王勋章。

据说，她劝说过戴安娜不要与查尔斯结婚，她说：“亲爱的，你必须明白，他们的幽默感和生活方式是不同的，我认为这不适合你。

”弗朗西斯•露丝本人，从结婚照片看，她是位颇秀丽的美人，戴安娜容貌上遗传她更多，她与丈夫约翰的婚姻是不幸福的，她在戴妃六岁时离开了丈夫，与彼得·尚德·卡德私奔，两人在两年后结婚。

关于孩子的抚养权，打过非常激烈的官司，有趣的是，弗朗西斯的母亲即上文提到的露丝夫人，成了关键的一点，露丝坚信婚姻是神圣的，所以她认为弗朗西斯出轨与另一个男人在一起不可原谅，她出庭作证反对她女儿，于是约翰才能成功保留戴安娜的监护权。

她再婚后一直在苏格兰低调地生活，然而1988年六月，她又与第二任丈夫彼得分居，因为他为了另一个年轻女人抛弃了她。

96年，又因醉驾被禁开车。

而她与戴妃关系，在戴安娜生前最后的时候，也并不融洽。

她孤独终老，晚年投身天主教慈善事业，2004年去世。

继母戴安娜继母讳瑞妮·麦考代尔，瑞妮是芭芭拉·卡特兰女士与亚历山大·麦考代尔的独女。

其母芭芭拉是20世纪世界上最畅销的作家之一，有大英帝国勋章与圣约翰勋章，她创作的浪漫主义小说总销量达7.5亿册（一说20亿），是伦敦的超级名流，以身穿粉红雪纺长袍、戴金色假发与羽毛帽、浓妆加身为常见造型。

芭芭拉出身中产阶级，她的长弟罗纳德·卡特兰少校是国会议员。

她出生不久后家庭财政迅速恶化，芭芭拉后来将这次经济衰退归因于她的祖父詹姆斯·卡特兰的自杀，她说，詹姆斯是一名金融家，在破产后开枪自杀。

然而，根据遗嘱认证登记处的记录，她的祖父是开黄铜铸造厂的，并且留下了92000英镑的遗产。

随后不久，她的父亲在第一次世界大战中死去，芭芭拉的母亲在伦敦开了一家干货店，以维持生计，不幸的是，除芭芭拉之外，她的母亲与两个兄弟都死于1940年的二战。

她26岁时与亚历山大上尉成婚，在女儿瑞妮童年时两人就离了婚，并改嫁亚历山大的堂弟休·麦考代尔，生有两子。

芭芭拉后来曾扬言，瑞妮的生父其实是第五代萨瑟兰公爵乔治·萨瑟兰或女王叔父肯特公爵乔治王子。

芭芭拉与蒙巴顿勋爵有着长期的友谊，当蒙巴顿1979年死去时，她说这是“我一生中最大的悲伤”。

蒙巴顿支持芭芭拉的各种慈善事业，甚至帮助她写了一本书《Love at the Helm》，提供了海军和历史背景资料。

蒙巴顿遇刺后，查尔斯王子成立了蒙巴顿纪念信托基金会，这本书1980年发行时，其收益的被捐给了基金会。

据说戴安娜喜欢阅读芭芭拉的小说，当然戴安娜并没有邀请芭芭拉参加她与威尔士亲王的婚礼。

芭芭拉后来公开批评戴安娜的离婚，但1997年戴安娜在巴黎车祸前不久，她与芭芭拉关系有好转。

瑞妮人生也十分戏剧性，她容貌美丽，18岁初次登上伦敦社交舞台，就被评为年度最优秀的名门闺秀，并与达特茅斯伯爵继承人订婚，生有四个孩子，婚后对政治产生了浓厚兴趣。

23岁时，她成为威斯敏斯特市议会中最年轻的保守党议员，她在当地政府工作了17年。

她参加了威斯敏斯特市的城市规划、公园和人事委员会，然后代表里士满进入大伦敦议会。

在这个职位上，她对环境规划和古建筑特别感兴趣。

她担任了斯德哥尔摩联合国人类环境会议政府工作组的主席。

1973年，她与她的同事约翰·斯宾塞有了婚外情，她与丈夫达特茅斯伯爵因此于1976年离婚，并于同年与约翰再婚。

她与继子女们关系很差，她重新装修家族宅邸，为了能大量使用新的镀金和墙纸，出售了大量艺术品与土地，斯宾塞伯爵虽然完全赞同妻子，但戴安娜的弟弟、爵位继承人查尔斯则讽刺继母品味“如摩纳哥五星级酒店的婚礼蛋糕般庸俗”。

戴安娜父亲于1992年去世，两天后，她的继子、新任斯宾塞伯爵查尔斯把瑞妮赶出了庄园。

瑞妮不允许拿走任何一件物品，除非她能证明这件物品是属于她的，而且她的所有员工都在未经通知的情况下被解雇。

戴安娜王妃亲自在瑞妮的卧室里站岗，看着女仆保琳·肖把伯爵夫人宽大的衣服放进四个路易威登的手提箱里。

当戴安娜王妃发现手提箱上有浮雕的大写字母“S”时，她决定这些手提箱也属于斯宾塞家族，在戴安娜的指示下，女佣匆忙打开名牌衣柜，把衣服装进黑色垃圾袋。

查尔斯把所有的袋子都踢下了楼梯。

瑞妮得到了400万英镑的遗产和伦敦梅菲尔的一栋联排别墅。

1993年瑞妮又与一位法国让·弗朗索瓦·德·尚布伦伯爵（拉法耶特侯爵后裔，与美国罗斯福家族有亲缘关系）于伦敦成婚，戴安娜和她的兄弟姐妹没有出席婚礼。

1995年，瑞妮又与这位尚布伦伯爵离婚，恢复她以前的姓氏，即斯宾塞伯爵夫人。

戴安娜去世之前，她与继母瑞妮和解。

说了这么多，就是想介绍一下戴安娜的家庭，从她的父母及祖辈的抓马婚姻可以看出，她生长环境（不是物质）是不怎么理想的。

从【电视内容】说一下查尔斯与戴安娜在本片中的婚姻非常赞同高赞剧评，这一场沸沸扬扬的事件不是简单的什么出轨、偷腥可以解释。

准确来说，是由于三人（查戴卡）感情观、人格与王室预计（或他们本人预计）的有了较大出入，而每个人又不能控制别人，随着感情与心态的变化，爆发是必然的。

先谈一下电视剧是如何描绘这几个人物的人格与感情的，从这些内心因素上事件的推动。

卡米拉的性格，是非常清楚自己要干什么的性格，而戴安娜与查尔斯，就是不清楚自己该怎么办的那类人。

前者人物有女王、撒切尔夫人，共同点是他们知道自己想要什么、该怎么做，并且懂得牺牲、懂得珍惜，这类人不管是善是恶，都不会让自己饱含悔恨、失控露丑，他们一般会接受现实，如果不接受，就会以自己的方式去坚定地改变，他们内心有种强烈的力量，不怎么受环境因素影响。

而戴安娜、查尔斯，更像是摇摆不定的钟，这类人情感充沛，但是却没有强大的毅力去扶持感情，代表人物还有前几季的菲利普与玛格丽特，他们或是不满现状，却不去克服内心的不适或寻求合理的改变；或心有真爱，却困于王室条例、内心的摇摆，最终草草结婚，在婚姻的梦魇中搏斗嚎叫，伤心伤身依然痛苦破裂。

他们不能接受现实，所以无法尽善尽美地完成职责；当出现可以改变的拐点时，又因为内心的懦弱，不愿付出高昂的代价，所以失去更多，最后抱怨他人。

他们以为自己搏斗的对象是深宫王权，却不知道其实对手是自己。

他们有自己想干的事，但却没能干成；他们明明不愿接受不幸的未来，却在别人的推动下亦步亦趋。

可幸的是菲利普与玛格丽特步入中晚年，逐渐与自己和解，戴安娜最后也终于作出了忠于自己的选择去离婚撕破脸。

戴安娜的痛苦很多情况下是来源于她无法适应新生活，不知道自己的定位在哪里，而她的丈夫不仅没有给她帮助，反而背叛了她，而且对她冷暴力。

她后来的蜕变是因为他意识到了自己真正的价值在哪里，她可以成为比她丈夫更耀眼的明珠，获得民众的爱，而不是去做深宫怨妇。

这场婚姻的问题在哪里，可以说太多了，戴安娜——关于她选择与查尔斯结婚，有人说她是被骗了，她以为会有最美的爱情，但却遇上了渣男；有人说她是虚荣又愚蠢。

我个人看法是：戴安娜是不爱（至少不是传统意义上真正的爱情）查尔斯的，当然不是说她不在乎不喜欢丈夫，但是她对查尔斯的感情，更多是出于“这是我丈夫”的爱、她是他的妻子，她对他怀着赤诚的情感，只要当时查尔斯回归家庭对她珍视尊重又帮她融入生活环境，她对他的情感一定会满溢出来并且忠贞不二，但现实中的走向注定最终这原本感情基础就差的婚姻走向灭亡与崩塌。

这肯定不会是两个成人之间那种浪漫相知的热烈情爱。

戴安娜生活于一个那样的家庭，她当时只是个18岁的、受教育程度不高的女性，她估计连什么是“爱”都不清楚。

她肯与一个三十岁相貌有点猥琐的男人（电视剧中的只是个驼背又别扭的年青招风耳帅哥）约会，除了是因为这男人是威尔士亲王之外不做他想。

电视剧中，演的很清楚，不管是谁开始搭讪（这不重要，搭讪不等于勾引），重点是戴安娜她对自己有可能成为王妃这一走向与事实是无比激动的，但是这种激动也不能简单说就是虚荣，倒不如说是无知，或者说，就是因为不够“虚荣”，才有了后来的悲剧。

因为她想象中的、渴望的，是成为那种童话故事里的“王妃”，不是现实中王权加冕的。

还记得她室友说的离别之言吗？

富丽堂皇的王宫、成群的仆人、华丽的衣裙、恣意鲜妍、英俊深情的王子，这是故事里的王妃，不是现实中的冰冷宫廷、独自一人冷清度日、各种繁文缛节与规矩、根本见不到的丈夫、各种要求与公务。

她嫁一个人却不知道自己要面对的究竟是什么，如梦似幻之下全是冰冷甜食的呕吐物。

最后说一下演员。

最初选角宣布“素人”艾玛·科林时，我对她是比较期待的，但是剧照曝光后对她的期待一下跌入谷底，戴妃肩宽脖子长，头身比十分完美，艾玛脖子短又前倾，仪态非常糟，完全不符戴妃时尚icon的设定，而且脸较短，显得更加娇小，面部上也不够深邃，很难体现戴安娜高贵优美的外表所带来影响力。

还有，戴安娜身前影像资料说明了她本人魅力是多么强大，声音温柔得像想象中的公主，总是给人善良真诚的优雅气息，这种气息不是玛丽苏式的完美，给人高高在上之感，而是让你感到她离你如此之近，就像一股春风，她很亲民，但却不给人庸俗平淡的感觉，一切充满爱心的举止都如此自然而不委顿矫作，所以受人喜爱决不是单纯的容貌美丽，见过她真人的人真的会臣服在她的魅力下。

《王冠》前几季，克莱尔·芙伊的表演与科林都出现了一样的问题，从剧本上看表演没有什么差错，演员演技层次细腻，角色前后统一，但是在模仿真实人物时，都会露出一种与本尊不相似的怯、惊、委缩，尤其是表现角色内心受到剧大震动十分脆弱时，都会四肢僵硬委缩，而且非常明显。

本尊应该更加舒展而内敛。

再说下女王，女王真实长相偏鹅蛋脸，下脸略多，轮廓较流畅，上庭略短下庭较长，眼睛超大，鹰钩鼻超挺，正面大鼻子，但不露鼻孔，眼间距短，脸长宽正好。

但是奥莉维娅太阳穴太凹陷了，又颧弓突出，就有些苦、土气，她的鼻子又短又塌又漏鼻孔，而且眼间距宽，与本尊长相相差太多，显得呆滞、凶、苦闷，所以她的表演完全没问题，但她做女王同款动作，脸的观感就有了差别，女王中年后眼角与嘴角都有些向下，五官又锋利，显得就有点冷漠，但奥莉维娅的表情就像是生气得要命要发火。

最后，全季最打动人的是那位费根油漆工，果然底层人挣扎于温饱，思念着子女，被政府齿轮历史长河辗压的绝望，依然迸发出的一点国民亮光，还是胜却闲得没事瞎搞的王室感情戏无数。

第三集 Fairytale 童话故事这一集完全聚焦在世纪婚礼上。

世纪婚礼1980年，查尔斯王子(1948-)向戴安娜(1961-1997)求婚成功，真是不知为何一开始这对会被视为天作之合，两者明明差了13岁。

求婚成功戴安娜和查尔斯王子于1977年中一个派对中认识，之前查尔斯王子曾与戴安娜的姐姐(Sarah Spencer)交往过。

剧中是查尔斯前去会见戴安娜姐姐无意撞见的。

剧中的小戴安娜1981年7月29日，33岁的查尔斯王子和年仅20岁的戴安娜的世纪婚礼于圣保罗座堂举行，共有2650位宾客被邀，共十亿人收看了电视直播。

戴安娜盛装打扮，她婚纱的尾部共8米长。

长达8米的裙子戴安娜的珠宝现在都传到了儿媳的手中。

戴安娜的锡兰蓝宝石戒指至于戴安娜为何如此备受爱戴，私以为一开始可能就是所谓的“民众缘”，就像是有的演员天生有观众缘，有的人天生有人缘招人爱，她的相貌和气质让她格外有吸引力就是招人喜爱；一是她不是循规蹈矩的王室成员，有着很强的自我个性，这一点上有点像格外有“人味”的玛格丽特公主，看她接受媒体采访就能发现，甚至太过坦诚和真实到和王室格格不入；

玛格丽特公主劝阻这场婚姻还有就是她致力于公共服务，服务于慈善事业；最后是她身上的悲剧色彩，求爱而不得，红颜最终薄命。

戴安娜分居后接受采访戴安娜的血统，经历和样貌，都可为合适的王妃人选。

正如剧中菲利普所说，等戴安娜更为年长些，会更出众，更自信，而查尔斯也会渐渐爱上她。

剧中菲利普和戴安娜之间倒是更来电哪怕爱情无法滋生，查尔斯便是在两边摇摆。

王室只想着劝查尔斯接受，没想到戴安娜无法像其他贵族女子一样对此“识大体”地睁一只眼闭一只眼。

王太后表示“两边兼顾”实属正常王室讲究的大局为重，查尔斯的怯懦与优柔，卡米拉的精明，也有戴安娜自身的天真，造就了一出悲剧，戴安娜太看重“爱”，没有她想要的”爱“她不愿意在这三个人的婚姻中扮演下去所谓该有的“王室成员”的角色。

戴安娜王妃王室本身就是讲究秩序而维护王冠，当你在王冠之下，你就要按着规则行事，为此戒掉情绪失去自我，而保证王冠稳定，这并无对错之分，只是选择不同。

就像是第三季讲到的两者对比，肆意有趣的以individualism为代表的玛格丽特公主，沉稳内敛不表露情绪甚至无趣的女王。

女王和妹妹而查尔斯自身本是怯懦，但他还都想要。

要么就一心为爱，铁了心和卡米拉在一起，大不了效仿不爱江山只爱美人的爱德华八世，曾为了辛普森夫人而退位；要么就履行职责，选择合适的王妃，为自己将来成为国王而稳定下来，和卡米拉一刀两断。

辛普森夫人和温莎公爵查尔斯和卡米拉的确是默契的一对，当初直接在一起就好了，也省得祸害旁人。

卡米拉和查尔斯而他在这个摇摆中，受伤的只有年轻的戴安娜王妃。

卡米拉太过精明，她本身就年长查尔斯一岁，她不会完全以“爱情”为重，更不会任人摆布。

果真被nanny带大的英国绅士们都好找年长型。

2005年，他如愿娶到了卡米拉，而戴安娜的生命停留在了36岁。

《王冠》第四季分集简介-第1-2集《王冠》第四季分集简介-第4-5集马岛战争《王冠》第四季分集简介-第6-8集《王冠》第四季分集简介-第9-10集

第九集 Avalanche 雪崩1985年，查尔斯37周岁生日，戴安娜在歌剧院献舞，查尔斯为此大动肝火。

我还以为是王室比较保守王妃当众演出不妥，没想到是因为查尔斯觉得她又在抢风头。

小戴美翻了此时的音乐是Billy Joel的《Uptown Girl》，被女王问谁是Billy Jo El，看着一段笑死，像不像你的长辈紧跟流行。

Billy Joel，是一位美国歌手，于1949年出生，首张专辑是《Piano Man》，发表于1973年。

《Uptown Girl》MV1988年3月，查尔斯遭遇雪崩。

此时戴安娜也开始私会他人，但经历了这次雪崩事件后，她想再一次为婚姻作出努力。

戴妃送的录影带她送给查尔斯的结婚周年礼物是自己录的一首歌，出自《歌剧魅影》，而这也正是演员Emma Corrin的试戏片段之一。

善意换来了佯装的善意和背后的讽刺查尔斯抱怨到面对所谓的善意还要装好人可太累了，安妮上演了人间清醒。

查尔斯反而怒了第十集 War 战争1900年，撒切尔被同僚背后捅刀子，结束了长达11年的执政生涯。

杰弗瑞直接发起批评在她的第一任期中，1982年，撒切尔夫人就hk会见DXP，但没有出现在剧集中。

撒切尔夫人曾想在1997年以后让英国人在HK的行政管理中继续发挥作用，譬如保留一名英国总督，该建议被中方拒绝。

最后撒切尔迫于形势不得不做出让步。

“1984年-1985年的英国矿工罢工”也没有出现在剧情中，每季顶多一集从普通人的视角出发，而这季只给了Fagan那集（S4E05）上。

英国矿工罢工是一个影响英国煤炭业的重大产业行动，罢工的失败极大削弱了英国工会，也被看成是撒切尔政府和保守党的在political及意识形态上的一场重大胜利。

撒切尔夫人在1990年11月辞任首相后不久，即被女王伊丽莎白二世颁赠地位崇高的功绩勋章。

她的丈夫丹尼撒切尔，则在1991年获册封为从男爵，以确保儿子马克·撒切尔有头衔可以继承。

而这也是自1965年以来，唯一册立的从男爵爵位。

撒切尔一家2005年10月13日，撒切尔夫人80岁大寿，伊丽莎白女王、首相托尼·布莱尔、前首相约翰·梅杰等贵宾均应邀出席。

女王，里根和撒切尔曾在其执政末期背叛她的亚伯拉昂的杰弗里·豪勋爵也获得她的宽恕，并在席间发表演讲高度赞美。

杰弗里·豪勋爵这一部主要聚焦在家事的拉扯上。

看女王日常让我想到了《甄嬛传》里甄嬛教儿子弘历的两句话，“喜怒不形于色”，“心事勿让人知”。

想和女王谈心太难了，女王对于情感外露婆婆妈妈真是零容忍，上一季对查尔斯的威尔士演讲就有所展现。

这一季情愿去喂狗也不愿和儿媳谈话，和儿子讲话还要让对方站起来以求快速结束。

女王slay女王对查尔斯，菲利普对戴安娜，这两场对话格外精彩。

这一季的菲利普格外体贴戴安娜表示自己不被接纳不被认可一直是个外人，菲利普说这个系统内每人都是外人，除了女王。

Everyone in this system is a lost, lonely, irrelevant soul, apart from the one person, the only person that matters. She is the oxygen we all breathe, the essence of all our duty. ——Philip最后的画面是一家子人过圣诞，小戴摆出了“钮祜禄”要开大的表情。。

季终《王冠》第二季影评：《王冠》背后，第二季分集简介《王冠》第三季影评：《王冠》第三季分集个人笔记《王冠》第四季影评：《王冠》第四季分集简介-第1-2集《王冠》第四季分集简介-第3集世纪婚礼《王冠》第四季分集简介-第4-5集马岛战争《王冠》第四季分集简介-第6-8集《王冠》第五季预测：《王冠》第五季剧情预测同类影视推荐：不列颠历代英国君主影视作品

我是不由自主的把《王冠》当纪录片看，但据说故事情节很多是虚构，想来也是，王室成员们是不会给剧组提供素材的，参考众多的回忆录和纪录片来编写剧本。

剧组演员有原型做比较，感觉大多数演员都跟原型有距离，很多演员的气质远远没有达到角色要求。

女王、玛格丽特都没有本人漂亮，也缺乏气质，女王稍好一点，还有睿智的一面，玛格丽特就完全不行了，作为乔治六世的掌上明珠，长公主玛格丽特也受到女王的宠爱，那种明艳的风采，没有表现出来。

这一季王妃的扮演者，处处强调年少时期戴妃的害羞，但眉眼之间显得内心戏十足，稚嫩的外表下掩饰着心机和算计，她那招牌式的低头偷看的眼神，缩头缩肩，甚至显得有些猥琐；大致剧情感觉还是比较符合史实，至于一些细节是否是真实的，就不得而知了；关于查尔斯和黛安娜之间的故事，一直是世人关注的焦点，王室的粉丝们一些拥戴一些拥查（卡），对于他们之间的恩恩怨怨，纷争不已，传言很多；作为往事包办婚姻里的主角，其实都是受害者，痛苦的婚姻里面，受折磨的是每一个人。

其中一个情节印象深刻：为了争取舆论上的支持，爱出风头的戴妃独自访问美国，大获成功，人气空前高涨，查戴婚姻已经处于破裂阶段的博弈已经白热化，卡米拉意识到自己被推上了查戴婚姻破裂的元凶的位置，于是请求查尔斯不要离婚，查尔斯跑去质问戴妃：舆论的一边倒给卡米拉带来了巨大的伤害，戴妃表示:I dont care! 查尔斯怒吼道：我在乎！

她是我的挚爱，我无时无刻不在在意着。

那一刻我都不禁同情起黛安娜：婚姻失败的一塌糊涂，丈夫对自己明确表示深爱着另外一个女人，本来就很自我的戴妃这一打击不轻，后面也就越走越极端。

查尔斯这个角色可能是选的最好的一个，年轻时的查尔斯，在强势的父母下，大概就那样了。

撒切尔夫人这个角色可能是最糟糕的，刻意模仿的慢节奏讲话，加上侧耳倾听的动作，感觉是年老失聪，脑子也转不过来，整个就是一个固执己见的老太太，还跟所有人都不和，最终因盟友背叛，很不情愿的下了台；跟女王对峙的几场戏也显得外强中干，黯然下台的时候，女王给颁发的勋章，更多的是同情而非认可。

一点粗浅的看法。